May 14, 2006

A HUGE KNOCK AGAINST AMERICAN ATHEISTS

As my readers know, I feel American Atheists and their No God Blog has an overwhelming anti-Israel bias there.
Now I have found out that their Atheist of the month for August of 2002 was none other than Holocaust denying white supremacist ass licking piece of shit Larry Darby.
Here is a picture of American Atheist President Ellen Johnson putting her hand affectionately on the piece of crap at an Atheists meeting:


Apparently, Darby was the Alabama state director for the American Atheists.

Larry Darby is now running as the Democratic candidate for Alabama Attorney General. He won't win because he is an Atheist. Other than that, his Jew hating, anti-gay, pro-White views would probably give him a slam dunk victory in inbreed country. According to the article in Newsday, he thinks 140,000 Jews died in Europe tops, and most of them died of Typhus.
He is off to New Jersey to meet with National Vanguard, a racist hate organization who whores with anyone who hates Jews, blacks, etc, even anti-Christians like Darby. The average IQ of National Vanguard's members is probably very close to the 73 average IQ of Qatar.

Here is a quote by the pond scum Darby via Hammer of Truth, "In my investigations of modern mythology, such as the Six Millions Lie, which by the way was first trotted out by Zionists during or immediately after World War One, there is a nasty aspect that is too often ignored - that of Jewish Supremacism. I’ve noticed megalomania or superiority complexes even with so-called secular Jews. Even though so-called secular Jews reject the existence of YHWH (the Jewish God of War, the surviving god of all the gods Jews once worshiped) who made them the Master Race, according to the Tanakh, so-called secular Jews are still Jewish Supremacists."

Screw Darby, and screw American Atheists for not writing a single bad word about their former Atheist of the Month.


Pharygula's main man PZ Meyers, "repudiates" Darby as a Democrat.

Here are a bunch of quotes by this vile piece of human feces. He even complained in February that American Atheists was too suportive of Israel. Meanwhile, like many Jew haters, he has something against bashing Muslims over bashing Jews. People like Darby are the sickest people on this planet. If I saw him tomorrow I would kick him in the balls.

UPDATE: Biblioblography has pointed out to me that American Atheists posted something about Darby in a newsletter dated August 2005: "We wish to confirm and underscore this fact. Darby has not served in that capacity as a Director for over two years. Many of his activities and statements, especially concerning the Holocaust as well as how he conducts himself regarding Atheist, Freethought, Humanist or nonbeliever groups and individuals, do not in any way reflect the official position of American Atheists or its officers."

I'll still add that I did feel that many of the blog commenters were anti-Israel, and a few of them are definitely anti-semites. I wasn't impressed by others support of these posters either.

38 comments:

  1. Now I have to rethink my stance.

    ReplyDelete
  2. BEAJ,

    That fool represents no one but himself

    He is not the spokesman of American Atheist thought

    Keep those flags a'flyin' buddy...
    (Israel,Canada and US)

    And look at that group, hell, they look like they could not organize a trip to the bathroom. And who is "dread-lock" rasta in the fore-ground. This whole scenanario looks like a home-made bullshit movie. It is nothing important.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Steve, yes I'm bigoted against those who preach hate and intolerance.

    Anon, I hope you know I'm talking about the American Atheists organization, not American Atheists.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I have often wondered why the atheist/skeptic community tends toward the left. I often feel like the only conservative skeptic in the world. Since Israel-bashing is primarily a favored activity of the left, this information does not surprise me. The secular humanism that atheists generally subscribe to *should* dictate a stance against terrorism and a stance that is pro-democracy and human rights.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ok, so what is this "left"?

    I see myself to be leftleaning and that's because the left is associated with secular humanism. Am I wrong to think so?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Did you know: The left, right in politics came with the french revolution when the opposition sat at the left side of the parliament and the others on the right.

    So as I understand it, left is associated with anti-establishment, pro-liberty and is progressive.

    I don't know how Isreal-Arab conflict has anything to do with it.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Roya, those on the far left are associated with being for the perceived underdogs. They also tend not to be able to recognize the severity of the threat of terrorists and terrorist mentality.
    I've said it before, I'm left when it comes to issues like abortion, gay rights, civil rights, etc. But I'm on the right on the war on terror, and I lean to the right when it comes to things like the death penalty and immigration. This kind of makes me a centrist I guess, as I'm all over the map, yet I have very good reasons, I believe, for every one of my stances.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I'm saying it is OK to hate, or at least dislike, people who hate and intolerant, or seem to approve of terrorism against innocents.

    ReplyDelete
  10. That Larry Darby has the chutzpah to do and say the things that he does is one thing. That American Atheists have given him a stage upon which he can give his orations is quite another thing. Let us not absolve the organization completely of any wrongdoing when it clearly chose him as Atheist of the Month in August 2002 knowing fully well what he was all about.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Thanks Lya for getting rid of Jihad Steve. I owe you. His stupidity/ignorance was draining me.
    Next time you respond to him you might want to ask him why he sent a letter to his congressman regarding the Palestinians but hasn't written a word in his blog about the Darfur situation.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Steve, have you converted to Islam?

    ReplyDelete
  13. BEAJ thanks for exposing this guy for what he is. Obviously his ability to use reason comes to a dead end when it comes to Jews. I had to quit several yahoo groups because of the hateful antisemitic comments that were posted there. Its stunning to see how widespread that garbage still is. As far as this Steve guy goes- it is not hypocritical to despise those who would deny others their right to think, live and even, yes choose to believe or not. It is just common sense. Please remind Steve that were he to live in a Moslem country what he believes or chooses not to believe in this case would subject him to the death penalty.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Steve is a dishonest poster. I've answered all his questions, and he asks the same things over and over. I've refuted him and explained my position to him. I'm not the only one who thinks he is an imbecile. I'm usually pretty good at figuring out who is brain dead.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I'm with the comment pimpette,

    I've noticed a change too and I don't know how Steve was able to take the abuse for so long.

    ReplyDelete
  16. It is simple here. If you don't want abuse from me, don't argue with me because I'm usually right.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Pimpette, you say quite a few things that make me cringe. I'm not expecting you to change. I'm not fond of apologists for Palestinians for example, but I make an exception when it comes to you.

    ReplyDelete
  18. The reason I make an exception for you is because I believe you will do background reading and you are open to learning, and you will address almost every point thrown at you.
    This is why I have a problem with Steve. He has no substance and cherry picks what he responds to.
    I have become more of a hardliner of late, I finally got TOTALLY fed up with the Palestinians once they voted for Hamas.
    I don't buy the Fatah corruption bs. It is obvious that the withdrawal of Gaza under Fatahs leadership meant nothing to the majority of Palestinians. Peace is not on the agenda with them.
    The cartoon protests pissed me off too, because I weigh that against the lack of protests against terror.
    So maybe I've changed a tad.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Sharon was elected because innocent Jews were being killed, so Israel wanted someone to PROTECT them.
    Israel was negotiating with Fatah prior to the election.
    Again, you are spinning from the reality of the situation in order to apologize for the Palestinians. If they were truly desperate and wanted a state, they would never have considered Hamas.
    56% of Palestinians, the same number who voted for Hamas, still support suicide bombing.
    If you are in a union and you don't want to strike, but 56% vote for strike, you are SOL. In life, innocent people get affected by majority decisions. That is life.
    And these people have to live with the consequences at no fault of their own. Except, there is no big voice in Palestinian areas that cry for a peaceful state next to Israel.
    Steve hardly answers any of my questions, and just attacks my message, not even the facts. He is useless.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I know it wasn't your intention, but thanks just the same:)

    He has a nasty habit of shooting the messenger, while rarely refuting the message.

    The rest of your post Lya, was excellent.

    ReplyDelete
  21. 200,000 people will not be removed from the the highly populated Jewish settlements. It isn't feasible.
    I was all for the Gaza withdrawal.
    Fatah is hardly the good guys. Just a lesser terrorist group that looked like they were up for negotiating.
    56% of Palis voted Hamas, and 56% still support suicide bombings.
    Intense negotiations weren't on the table until after the election....if Fatah won.

    Nuff said.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Pimpette, can you comment on the conclusions made here?

    ReplyDelete
  23. Lya is extremely intelligent Pimpette.

    And just because you don't like the messenger doesn't mean you shot down the message.

    She is absolulely right, and faithfreedomm has a point.

    Who is to say that isn't the interpretation. And when you look at the atrocities done by Muslims in the world today, how can you say that they aren't taking those interpretations to heart.

    That being said, I admire what you are trying to do on your blog regarding getting Muslims to speak out against terror. Unfortunately I predict you will have to get used to crickets chirping.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Can you refute what this guy says here, Pimpette.

    ReplyDelete
  25. "If I saw him tomorrow I would kick him in the balls."

    He is a lawyer, so no balls there. Perish the thought ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  26. Pimpette, the point is that many Islamic leaders seem to be using these bastardized versions of the Koran as Gospel. So different interpretations do exist, and are being acted out.

    Snoopy, you have it confused. Lawyers have balls, but no heart.

    ReplyDelete
  27. BEAJ:
    I think maybe you need to do some research next time.
    I did some digging around on this post, & apparently, according to this:
    www.centerforatheism.org/newsletters
    The Aug. 4 2005 specifically says,
    "We wish to confirm and underscore this fact. Darby has not served in that capacity as a Director for over two years. Many of his activities and statements, especially concerning the Holocaust as well as how he conducts himself regarding Atheist, Freethought, Humanist or nonbeliever groups and individuals, do not in any way reflect the official position of American Atheists or its officers."

    So your commentary is seriously 3 years outta date.

    As to this:
    I feel American Atheists and their No God Blog has an overwhelming anti-Israel bias there.
    That simply isn't so.
    That's the fallacy of the unrepresented example, BTW.
    Do me a favor, & google 'spotlight, nogodblog', or 'chad hetman',nogodblog'.
    Or maybe you should email David Silveman, an atheist Jew, & maybe just ask him about it.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Oops, sorry, misspelled 'Silverman'.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Thanks RA. I will post an update. I did a search at the no god blog and couldn't find anything, so I was waiting to see if I was wrong. I was almost convinced I wasn't because nobody up until now said something.

    ReplyDelete
  30. BEAJ:
    I was almost convinced I wasn't because nobody up until now said something.
    Truthfully, after that last debacle, I don't think you got too many readers from that blog.

    ReplyDelete
  31. I realize that. But I figure someone would say something. Some of the regulars here post on the No God Blog. But I'm glad someone came to their defense finally.

    ReplyDelete
  32. BEAJ:
    But I figure someone would say something.
    Well, silence doesn't always signify assent.
    I rarely come here. NGB is my usual hangout.
    Some of the regulars here post on the No God Blog.
    The only person I've seen thus far has been Lya, & I don't think she goes there much anymore (but I can't speak for her, so I don't know for sure).
    But I'm glad someone came to their defense finally.
    Well, honestly, I've been at the NGB for about a year now. & I've seen a lot go on there. Anti-zionists actually do receive short shrift from the majority. Anti-semites have been wailed on.
    & for the record, I'm now 1/2 way afraid to criticize Israel in any way. Lest I be labelled anti-semite.
    Nice going.

    ReplyDelete
  33. RA, most people who criticize Israel are anti-semites first. You rarely see these dudes also criticize Saudi Arabia, the Darfur situation, etc, with the same vigor. No country is perfect and no country was formed with 100% native approval. But Israel seems to get way more attention than any other conflict on this planet, and most of it is based on bad information. That being said, I've criticized Israel previously and the settlers on this blog btw.

    ReplyDelete
  34. The Comment Pimpette:
    Wow.
    They have been intentionally misused by some Muslims and non-Muslims alike to advance wholly political agendas, with total disregard for accompanying teachings that overwhelmingly condemn self-aggrandizing militarism and offensive war-mongering.
    Yep. Same thing's been done w/almost every religious text in history.
    I came to the same conclusions after reading the Qu'ran verses you've quoted.
    & I'm an atheist.
    I've done some research into the other side, & found that what I've been told is not quite what's there in black & white.
    We also tend to forget that the muslim faith has had some positive sides to it. The Medinaists. The Sufis. The Baha'i.
    Religion tends to reflect humanity, in both its perversity, as well as its benignness. Unfortunately, it leans more towards the former.

    ReplyDelete
  35. BEAJ:
    A, most people who criticize Israel are anti-semites first.
    I dunno. I tend to criticize Israel, but I don't really hate anyone.
    You rarely see these dudes also criticize Saudi Arabia, the Darfur situation, etc, with the same vigor.
    I'll have to take your word for that.
    No country is perfect and no country was formed with 100% native approval.
    You say that so often, it's starting to lose its punch.
    But Israel seems to get way more attention than any other conflict on this planet, and most of it is based on bad information.
    There's a lot of reasons for that.
    As the major democracy in that part of the world, it's gonna get eyeballed a lot.
    As for bad info, well, who do I trust? Nothing personal, but you seem to have a distinct bias.
    & before you start throwing down, forbear, please:
    You seem to infer that everyone would be better off if the Palis were extinquished. Your recent 'Poll' evinces a distasteful (at least to me) bias. You've stated, as memory serves, that 'If you're pro-humanity, you can't be pro-Palistinean'.
    & honestly: have you been over there? In the ME? Do you even KNOW any Palis?
    While I am in no way anti-Israel (I think the whole argument about 'existence' is a moot point either way: they're there, they exist, it's a stupid talking point), in no way am I anti-Arab either.
    I'd rather examine the facts & make my own conclusions, rather than taking any 1 person's word for it.
    That being said, I've criticized Israel previously and the settlers on this blog btw.
    I'm fairly unfamiliar w/your blog: I'll poke about, & see.
    Thanks, BTW, for your update to the post.

    ReplyDelete
  36. RA, I said MOST people who criticize Israel, not all people.
    You don't have to take my word for the fact that Israel is criticized and other countries are not. It is a fact and easily proved if you have the time.
    Facts are facts, I only have so many answers for so many questions, so at least I'm being consistent at the risk of making a statement that loses its punch over time.
    I've never been to Israel, but I'm very familiar with the situation. I have never got into a heated discussion with a live Palestinian though. But I've seen enough interviewed, and I have their own words on some of my multimedia here on my blog. I don't doubt I have a bias, but I also have a bias against those who believe in a young earth. I have done loads of research on this subject, and I used to think there was hope. I am not for genocide, but I am being honest that the Palestinians contribute nothing to humanity and their only goal is to destroy Israel.
    Do a blog search for "Amona" with my blog to see some criticism. The poll is sort of tongue in cheek but it reflects the fact that I have no respect for the Palestinians anymore....especially after the Hamas vote.

    And I am always open to new facts and information being the Atheist that I am.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Hey, I wanna pile on here. Don't knock Alabama! Trust me, a jackass like that, atheist, Bible-banging, or whatever, wouldn't get elected in this state. We don't elect racist white trash here. Maybe in some podunk town he might get elected dog-catcher, but not this, no way.
    ;-)

    /gotta stick up for Bama

    ReplyDelete
  38. Hdoff? I don't get it.
    I think Lya makes excellent points and having read her story about how she almost became a Jew on her blog gives me good background on where she is coming from.
    I think she is much more knowledgable then you, and even me, when it comes to Israel.
    She is extremely intelligent and you aren't winning too many points calling her stupid, especially if others are reading this.
    I suggest you go to her blog and look up her 3 posts on how she became an Atheist before you go any further slamming her.

    ReplyDelete