November 30, 2006


And plenty of them live in North America. Doesn't matter what scientific evidence proves. The literal bible overrides all science, doncha know. Here is a great short scene from Inherit the Wind. Spencer Tracey really makes a monkey out of....OK, just watch the scene:

For a longer version of this scene go here. has lots of great stuff on its site. Check it out.

Can you believe that there are people who think the earth is young? Can you?

Here is the biggest goofball of all, Kent Hovind (he is in prison right now for tax fraud), getting his lies about science refuted. He gets his ass handed to him, actually:

The thing is he sounds good to the uneducated reality denier. People who want or need to buy it, buy it. The sad truth.

November 28, 2006

What The Hell Is A Nation Within A Nation?

'TORONTO -- Parliament formally recognized Quebec as a nation within Canada Monday, a symbolic gesture that has led to a Cabinet resignation and ignited concerns over a renewed push for the French-speaking province's independence.

The motion presented by Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper, which calls Quebec a nation within a united Canada, is largely symbolic in that it requires no constitutional amendment or change of law. The opposition Liberals and New Democrats supported the motion, so it passed easily through the House of Commons.

It was devised by Harper to pre-empt a similar attempt by the Bloc Quebecois, the separatist party in Parliament that represents Quebec, whose members also reluctantly backed the resolution once they realized they had been outflanked by Harper.'

I'm still reading the news on this and scratching my head. A nation with a nation? Is that like the Vatican in Italy? What is Harper going to do next, declare Ontario a nation within a nation just outside of another nation within a nation (Quebec)? Or maybe we can call British Columbia a nation within a nation but far away from another nation within a nation.

Yeah, I get it. In Quebec, the French language is king. And the women are easier. And the men are yard apes with attitudes. I understand the cultural differences. But either let Quebec separate or don't. But just quit wasting tax payer's money on crap like this.

The writing is on the wall for Quebec anyways. I say let em separate, the French make easy targets for the Muslims. They are too oblivious to what is happening outside of the ice rinks and strip bars and they don't even know that their mother country France, has cars burning nightly. Quebec is going to be the first Islamic state in North America soon enough. They will be a Muslim country within a country that will be very nervous. The Jews already can see it, they've been leaving for quite some time, and the Chinese are trying to avoid Quebec too, even though it goes against their plans of taking over Canada.

November 24, 2006

Muslims Provide Lots of Stand Up Material

Click cartoon to enlarge it:

A Palestinian grandmother blew herself up yesterday while trying to take a few Israeli soldiers with her. Luckily, she failed in taking anyone with her.

Her last dialogue went like this:

Grandma: I feel sick.

Grandpa: Why don't you throw up.

Grandma left. She must have heard grandpa wrong.


Relatives said Najar left behind seven sons and two daughters, plus some 41 grandchildren,"
So much for the Palicaust. 7 children each averaging having 6 children each. And living in such supposedly "oppressive" conditions. Do Palestinians think ahead at all?

I've mentioned here before that I'm a regular on a Yahoo message board that is mainly to do with the Israel-Palestinian conflict, going back around 4 years. It is affectionately known as the HATE BOARD. It is full of knowledgable pro-Zionists, and an assortment of whacked out anti-semites and Muslims/Arabs (most of whom pretend to be Christian Americans).

It gets funny at times and much of the anti-Zionist arguments are based on false assumptions, revised history, and false pretenses. Of course, some anti-semites there pull no punches but I look at them as the best justification for why Israel is needed to exist. Check it out for yourself. Sign in, it is easy, and make a few posts. It is addictive and it is also a great way to release stress.

Here is a sample of the stupidity. The poster is a hairdresser in Canada, and most likely a Muslim who won't admit it. We knew she was stupid but she recently set a new standard for herself:

by: j_d_mac_vieau (F/Grace Brothers Department St) 11/18/06 06:03 pm
Msg: 3020540 of 3028329

Over time from 1948, Israel has massacred over 20 million Palestinians. This is called genocide over time.

Posted as a reply to: Msg 3020527 by odessitochka_angie
She made a correction in a later post:

by: j_d_mac_vieau (F/Grace Brothers Department St) 11/18/06 06:07 pm
Msg: 3020564 of 3028334

I stand corrected; 20 billion palestians of various religions

Posted as a reply to: Msg 3020543 by pltk_2002
Yes, she is for real. Yes this is what she believes to be true. One of the reasons I go this particular message board is to refute the anti-Zionists/anti-semites with actual facts. Not to change the poster's minds (because they are usually too far gone), but for the lurkers and other rational people who might be on the fence and don't understand the actual history of the conflict.

Ok, now this piece of news makes me laugh:


In case you haven't heard, 6 imams were removed from a US Airways flight that was going from Minneapolis to Phoenix on Monday night. Read the article, there were many reasons why the precautions were taken.

But the funny part is that Muslim clerics want Muslims to boycott US Airways. That would make that particular Airlines the safest perceived one on this planet. It would be great for business if Muslims carried out their boycott.

If the Muslim clerics were smart and wanted to cause damage to US Airways they would declare a REVERSE BOYCOTT, and state that for now on Muslims will only fly US Airways.

Muslims in the West can blame OBL for this, but more importantly they can blame the fact that they haven't collectively stood up publicly against terrorism, and that includes terrorist acts committed against Israel.

Great post on Girl on the Right. Only 277 million Muslims think that suicide bombings are justifiable. How many non Muslims on the planet think the same thing?

November 23, 2006

What If Atheists Went Door To Door Looking For Converts

It might look something like this:

Thanks Reza for the link.

Christians and Muslims go out of their way to try to get people to believe their nonsense. Jews don't. Atheists sometimes go out of their way to get people to accept facts like evolution and an ancient earth and universe. I'm content when people don't reject fact in order to maintain a literal book of myths. It doesn't matter to me if someone believes in God, as long as they don't reject science to do so. I'm all about evidence.

Happy Turkey Day to all my American readers. And thank you for being Canada's defense department.

November 20, 2006

Response To Penn And Teller's Bible Video

I get a lot of hits on my blog thanks to Google searches. One post I made a while ago on Penn and Tellers Bible Is Crapola (my word for Bullshit), in which I embedded the Penn and Teller episode comes up on the top 10 on Google for many key word searches.

Someone just left this stunningly long and Christian apologetic response to the video:

1 – There are different Genesis accounts (Genesis 1 and 2) that conflict.

Genesis 1:27 says that on the 6th day “God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.” Genesis 2 says God created Adam, Adam could eat fruit, he named the animals, God saw he was lonely and created Eve.

Penn & Tell and “Mr. Skeptic” basically say, “See! Genesis 1 says He created man and woman at the same time and Genesis 2 says they were created at different times! You can’t believe the Bible, it contradicts!”

Wow. First off, Genesis 1 is an overview or summary of the seven days of creation. Genesis 2:4 picks up with the story/details, “This is the account of the heavens and the earth when they were created.” This is obviously no contradiction.

Example: My freshman year of high school was rough; I didn’t make friends very easily. But my sophomore year got much better as I got to know more people and I became close friends with George and John. We did everything together. My junior year was cool because I tried out for the basketball team and eventually became the starting point guard! I also started dating Cindy. By my senior year I was offered a scholarship to Georgetown, was co-captain of the basketball team with John and in a long-term relationship with Cindy. High school was great.

Now, this is an account of my high school years. As a freshman, I was picked on by the older boys because I was short and slightly overweight. A few other boys, George and Jeff were picked on too and we became known as the Twinkie Trinity. Anywhere I went, people would call out names and make fat jokes at us. Etc….

Now, is it a contradiction that I summarized my four HS years and then started to give details about each one? Is it a contradiction that I said I became good friends with George my sophomore year but I mentioned that I knew him earlier (in a more detailed account) in my freshman year? No! Same goes for Genesis. It begins with a summary, and moves to specifics.

2 – People say Elvis is alive too.

Penn & Teller make it a point to show how there are people who believe Elvis is still alive, there are books and writings about him still being alive and there are even contradicting accounts of his life (Elvis never did no drugs!). . . all this just 25 years after his death! See, Elvis and Jesus sightings are just the same. We know Elvis is dead (except for a few loonies) and we also know Jesus is dead (except for a lot of loonies).

First, Elvis never made claims to be God or that after he died he would rise from the dead.

Second, Elvis doesn’t impact peoples’ lives the way Jesus does.

Third, the disciples were transformed from scared men into bold men because they saw the risen Jesus. What else would have changed them from running away at his arrest and not wanting to be associated with him to loudly proclaiming that he is the Messiah and that he rose from the dead? One thing: seeing the resurrected Jesus! They were all even willing to die for what they saw. Couldn’t they have conspired and made up that story? Well, men won’t die for a known lie. If I tell you I am a three-toed Martian and you torture me, I will quickly tell you I was lying. (Some may object that radical Muslims will die for their faith but they are missing the point: they are dying for something they believe to be true, not that they know is false!)

Fourth, Elvis’ body could be dug up. Try digging up Jesus’.

Fifth, just because some people claim one thing to be true that isn’t, doesn’t mean that others who claim basically the same thing aren’t telling the truth! Example: Bill Clinton says he didn’t have sexual relations with Monica. Just because Bill’s story was a lie doesn’t make all non-adultery claims by other men lies as well! Just because some say Elvis is alive and they are wrong, doesn’t mean people who believe Jesus rose are wrong too (true it doesn’t prove he did rise, but you can’t use the Elvis claim to prove Jesus didn’t rise from the dead). Bill had sexual relations with Monica, therefore the Pope had sexual relations with Madonna. Or, Reagan never smoked pot, therefore neither did Snoop Dogg. Riiiiight.

Finally, Penn & Teller constantly mention “Elvis never did no drugs,” referring to some people who say he didn’t even though others say he did. They use that phrase to imply a contradiction. So, what contradictions in the 4 gospels are they referring to? Do they name any? Nope. (For a resource of the apparent contradictions, see When Critics Ask by Geisler)

3 – Noah’s Ark couldn’t fit two of all those species on it.

“There’s not a boat in the world big enough to hold the millions of species that are on this planet” say most skeptics. And, of course, they’re right. But Penn & Teller seem to forget a few minor details:

1 – They didn’t need to take any amphibians since they can survive in water. Take takes care of quite a few animals.

2 – Insects. Well, first of all they don’t take up much room now do they? Second, many wouldn’t have to have been taken since they could survive on floating debris. Also, since insects make up a majority of the millions of species on the earth, that really drops the number of animals Noah had to take.

3 – All of the sea creatures (which make up a large portion of the species in the world) didn’t need a ride either.

4 – Noah didn’t need to take every breed and variation of animal. Just one according to its kind. It would only take a couple of breeds of dogs or horses to get the many various kinds we have today. Variations occur today and when you mix two breeds together, you tend to find yourself with a new breed of animal. However, you still end up with the same type of animal (breed dogs and what you get is still a dog, not a tiger!).

5 – Remember, the ark was quite large and it had different levels too. 450 feet long by 75 feet wide by 45 feet high is a pretty big boat! That’s a volume of over 1.5 million cubic feet. A boat like that could hold a very large number of animals. Also, remember that he didn’t have to take adult animals, he could have taken very young ones. So, elephants, giraffes, hippos, (even though there are very few large animals like these) etc… wouldn’t have taken up quite as much room.

4 – There is no historical account of Moses or Hebrews in Egypt. If they did exist, they probably crossed at a shallow part of the Reed Sea.

Hebrews in Egypt? How do we know? Well, Penn & Teller say there is no evidence to show there were any Hebrews in Egypt. Funny, is there any evidence showing that either Penn or Teller ate any food in the month of May in 1983? If not, should we assume they did not eat any food in that month? Now in the same respect the argument can be said “is there any proof that Penn or Teller didn’t live in northern China in 1983?” But, lack of evidence is not evidence of a lack of history. Archeology continues to unearth findings that are discovering more and more evidence of the Bible’s claims, and the more time goes by, the more the Bible is confirmed. Hey, speaking of, most people who object to the history of the Bible tend to full-heartedly support evolution. What about all those transitional forms? “Well,” they say, “just because we haven’t found them yet, doesn’t mean they’re not there!” Hmmm, sounds familiar. So, critics of the Bible, shouldn’t you at least allow others to use the same argument you are using?! A bit hypocritical wouldn’t you say?

As far as evidence goes, there has been much claim and support for the Hyksos being the Hebrews. See as well as for the idea that the Habiru were the Hebrews. Also for other findings on evidence for the Hebrews, see the book, Israel in Egypt by Hoffmeier. The Brooklyn Papyrus (ancient Egyptian record) shows the ownership of slaves from a Semitic group in the north west “Asiatic” region with names that are not from the Egypt area.

Keep in mind, many ancient civilizations (especially the Egyptians) didn’t like to record their defeats in battle, let alone allowing a slave force to leave, have an army chase them down and end up dead.

Oh, and about the crossing at a shallow part of the Reed Sea, if the Hebrews crossed at a shallow part of the Reed Sea then how in the world did all those trained Egyptian soldiers die in a few inches of water?! That would be a miracle!

5 – God killed all the firstborn in Egypt. How loving and kind is that?

Amazing. When humans play God and kill thousands of innocent babies each year by having abortions we call that our “right.” But when God is God, well, we have no toleration for that. Or when America goes to war, don’t we know that when we bomb the other nation we will inevitably kill some innocent people? Yet we still go to war full well knowing that we will kill innocent people.

Speaking of innocent, we have to have a different perspective on that issue. Is anyone perfect? Has anyone kept the laws of God 100%? Has anyone even followed his or her conscious 100%? Nope. So the concept of innocent is based on comparison. And the way we compare ourselves to others is usually something like: “well I’m not perfect, but I’m no Hitler either!” Isn’t it easier to compare our little lies and what not to the Hitlers, Husseins, cannibals, murderers, rapists and pedophiles of the world? But compared to them we are all angels! Really, we pick the worst people in the world, measure our lives against theirs and then say we are good and innocent! Why not compare ourselves to Mother Teresa, Ghandi, or Jesus?! Because we would feel bad about our lives, that’s why! Innocence is not a comparison game, it’s a rule-oriented one. Have you followed all the rules? If not, you’re not innocent. I don’t care how big or little the rule is that you’ve broken, you’re still in the wrong.

So, let’s then take a look at innocence in God’s eyes. And, to keep it simple, let’s just look at the 10 Commandments. Ever murdered someone? No! Well hang on, Jesus said to hate is the same as murder. Dang it. Ever cheated on your spouse? No! Well hang on again, Jesus said lusting after another woman is committing adultery in your heart. Double dang! Ever taken the Lord’s name in vain? Oops. Ever been dissatisfied with the things you own and desperately wanted what someone else had? There’s your coveting. Ever put someone or something ahead of God on your priority list? There’s having another god before Him. Ever disrespected your mom or dad? Man, this is hard! Ever lied? Ok, ok, I get the point. You see, we’re not as innocent as we would like to make ourselves out to be. But big deal, I’ve broken a few little things here and there. I’m sorry, what was that? A few little things? How many times have you lied, lusted, hated, disrespected, coveted, cursed, etc? A few?! Come on, be honest, we already know you’re a liar. And what’s this about little things? Who gets to decide the scale of big and little? You? Riiiight. Elvis never did no drugs! Come on, God didn’t say “Here’s my laws. Oh, and this set of them I don’t really care if you break or not. I made them up for the heck of it. Just avoid this list of the real bad ones.” No, we don’t get to decide these things because we are not God. We have to understand we have not broken laws made up by someone inferior to us or even on the same level as us, no, we have broken God’s law. There is a big difference.

And how do we make up for breaking a law? On earth, if we break a law made by humans we may have to pay a fine, do some community service, lose our job, or go to jail. What is the price for breaking a law made by God? Just as humans got to make the rules and make the punishments for those rules, God made the rules and he gets to decide the punishment. And He says the punishment is death. So, we can argue all day that we only do a “few” “small” sins, but even one of those is punishable by death. So is it unfair? Nope, that’s the law. What’s unfair is that most of us get to keep living after we break His law dozens, hundreds and thousands of times.

We also tend to think that if someone dies in the Bible, then it is bad. Death is not necessarily bad. If a God exists and a Heaven exists, then those who have faith in him need not fear death. Also, just because God punishes someone in the Bible doesn’t mean they go to Hell. King David had his firstborn die because he committed adultery with Bathsheba, and yet in the end David was considered a man after God’s own heart. God punished David, Samson, Adam, Eve, Moses, Abraham, and many others but it doesn’t mean they all went to Hell.

So, as for this notion of God being a mean God for killing all the firstborns in Egypt, keep these things in mind: death is not necessarily bad and we are not innocent. We don’t stop buying things from China because of their child limit policy, stop buying certain shoes or clothes because they were made by children, stop shopping at stores because of their views on certain ethical issues, etc. but for some reason we will picket a God who punishes law breakers. (And for those of you who argue that some of the firstborn were infants and they shouldn’t be punished since they can’t understand words let alone laws, the traditional belief is that little children go to heaven anyway so you could say God, in a sense, spared them of a hard earthly life and allowed them into Heaven. Not a very cruel thing at all.)

6 – Jesus did slight of hand tricks, not miracles. Anyone could do that today.

One of my favorites. Penn & Teller already come with the preconceived idea that miracles aren’t even possible so by default, Jesus must have deceived the people with tricks. Hmm, interesting, the guy who says don’t lie, love your neighbor, pray for and help your enemy, etc… actually lies and deceives those around him. Riiiiight.

“Mr. Skeptic” himself says that the miracles that Jesus did could be done by Penn & Teller. After he says that, they move on to the next topic. What?! No walking on water by Penn, no bringing a dead man back to life by Teller and neither of them give sight to a blind guy?!?! Oh, I suppose they’re just choosing not to do a miracle. If you’re going say it was slight of hand, go ahead and raise a 3-day old dead person from the grave or go ahead and give Stevie Wonder his sight. Anyone could do it? Elvis never did no drugs!

7 – Apollonius is a guy who lived when Jesus did and was said to have done miracles and rise from the dead too.

So Penn & Teller mention that there were many “Messiahs” around the time of Jesus. How do we know he really was it? A guy named Apollonius seemed to have done the same type of things Jesus did so why don’t we follow him?

Good questions. Here are some answers: first of all the only remotely early writing we have that mentions this guy is by Philostratus who wrote approx. 200-245AD. That is a good 150-200 years after Apollonuis lived! And why did he write about him since he didn’t even live in the same time you ask? Good question! An empress wanted to dedicate a temple to Apollonius and told Philo guy to go ahead and do it. Hmmm, motive? Maybe to please the empress? Maybe we embellish a little in order to please the empress? So one source 150-200 years after the fact. No eyewitnesses. How does Jesus compare? Well, to make a long story short: numerous eyewitnesses (Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Peter, Paul, James, Jude . . .) all written within 50 years of his death. Most of them within 30 years of his death! Many sources vs. one. 25-50 years after death vs. 150-200 years after death. Hmmm, which may be more accurate?

And by the way, why are people, who reject the evidence of Jesus being a miracle worker or even alive, accepting the story of Apollonius? If you’re going to accept a one person, non-eyewitness writing 150-200 years after the fact in order that a empress can build a temple; then how much more should you accept multiple authors writing within 25-50 years of Jesus? Anyone else see ridiculous bias?

8 – The only proof of the resurrection is the empty tomb, big whoop.

Would a non-empty tomb be better evidence? If someone rose from the dead, wouldn’t that be the first important sign? Wouldn’t that be a requirement?

No, the empty tomb isn’t the only proof (although it is perhaps the most important). The disciples ran away when Jesus was arrested. Why? Because they were scared for their lives! They weren’t around at the crucifixion. Why? Because they were scared for their lives! A few days after the crucifixion they were boldly proclaiming the message that Jesus was alive. Why? Because they were scared for . . . . wait. No, they no longer feared for their lives. In fact, all but one of the disciples died for their faith. What on earth would change a dozen men from frightened and scared individuals to a dozen bold and courageous individuals willing to die for their faith? Only being convinced that Jesus had in fact risen from the dead would transform such men!

Now I assume Penn & Teller would respond, “they just made up the resurrection story.” Well, what did they have to gain? Nothing! The culture of the day was faithful Judaism and by proclaiming that Jesus (who was accused of blasphemy) was the Messiah and even God himself, well, you might as well write out your own obituary. In fact, the disciples had everything to lose, not gain! If they made it up, there still runs the problems of consistency and death.

First, consistency. If this group of uneducated men made up this whole thing, then when they wrote about it, they would make sure all their stories sounded the same. Well, though the Gospels tell the same basic story, they all have different details. Just as if you were to ask four different people to talk about September 11th, 2001, the Gospel writers tell the same story with different details. (Many people, when asked about 9-11, forget to mention that a plane crashed in PA or one crashed in the Pentagon. Does that mean it didn’t happen? No! Some focus on the buildings crashing and burning, some focus on how many died, some focus on the rescue attempts while some focus on who did the attacks. They are different, but they don’t contradict. The same is true with the Gospels. They tell the same story, with different focus and emphasis. See question #2 for thoughts on apparent contradictions.)

Second is death. People don’t die for what they know is a lie. If the disciples made it up, they wouldn’t die for it. For example, I might tell you I am a spy from Mars and that I believe 2+2=7, but the minute you torture me or threaten my life, I’m going to tell you I was joking or lying. The same is true for the disciples. All but one died a martyr’s death for their faith in the resurrection. If they had made it up, at least one of them would have cracked! But none of them did. Now, some may object and say that some radical Muslims blow themselves up and that disproves that people won’t die for lies. Well, no, it doesn’t. Those radicals actually believe that they are right, they aren’t blowing themselves up for something they know is wrong. People won’t die for a known lie! And the disciples didn’t die for something they knew was false.

For a resource on refuting other claims on the resurrection, see Evidence that Demands a Verdict by Josh McDowell or I Don’t Have Enough Faith to be an Atheist by Geisler and Turek.

9 – The Bible was voted on and other books were voted out.

Sure, and the Da Vinci Code is accurate history. Elvis never did no drugs! So how was the New Testament compiled? What were the requirements to make it into the New Testament? Well, let’s take a look:

1 – had to have been written by an eyewitness to Jesus or a contemporary of an eyewitness and therefore also had to be written in the 1st century (no Gnostic 2nd and 3rd century “gospels”)

2 – had to be historically accurate (no Da Vinci Code)

3 – had to be well circulated or quoted or used by the early church (eliminates some obscure person/church using or quoting one odd letter)

4 – the “spiritual” content had to reflect God’s character (no God loves evil stuff)

So, as we see, the church didn’t create the cannon, it discovered what was already there. It discovered what letters and gospels were true and accurate. Kind of like the question, who invented the fact that the interior angels of a triangle total to 180 degrees? Well, nobody invented it, they just discovered what was already there. If the Lord sent the Holy Spirit to remind the disciples of all that he said and did (John 14:26), then those who were closest to him would be the ones to accurately write what he said and did.

And by the way, didn’t we have to vote on rights for women, minorities and such? Just because something is examined and put to a vote doesn’t mean the thing being voted on is wrong or misguided.

10 – What about these verses:

Exodus 21:7 – slavery is ok?!!? No, reading the context of the verse you will see that the female servant is meant to be married. There is a very lengthy discussion of such verses here: The slavery in the OT was very different from what we think of as slavery. Poor people would sell themselves as servants to another wealthier person so they could live and be provided for (more like a job than the cruel slavery we think of). You also need to keep in mind that nowhere in the Bible does God command slavery, He is working within the context of a particular culture of the day.

1 Corinthians 11:14 – its bad for men to have long hair!?! Wait, didn’t Jesus have long hair?! First off, all those wonderful paintings of Jesus, how do we know what he looked like? Did they take pics of him back in the day? No! All of them are just guesses! As a matter of fact, he was just an average Joe, or Jew. Isaiah 53:2 says, “He had not beauty or majesty to attract us to him, nothing in his appearance that we should desire him.”

Now, Elijah had long hair (2 Kings 1), the Nazarites had long hair, Samson had long hair, Absalom was praised for his long hair . . . . So what is Paul talking about? Some say that the long hair being referred to is hair past the shoulders since women would have their hair that length and in the culture, hair to your shoulders for men was normal. Remember, long hair is a somewhat relative-to-the-culture term. Long hair in the army is what, 2 inches?! Long hair for boys in the 60s and 70s is a different type than what long hair is today. So, some would say that Paul is just saying don’t have hair like women’s hair.
The person who wrote this now has a blog named "Response To Penn and Teller." I guess this person is setting a new trend.....a new blog for every new post.

I'm not going to go over the "points" made in the above post, but I find it very laughable how creationists will bend over backwards to explain how and why no evidence exists when it comes to their claims with respect to the bible, and yet they deny mounds and mounds of evidence when it comes to evolution and an ancient earth, and they bend over backwards looking for holes in the evidence.

OK, twist my arm. Here is the Penn and Teller video again:

November 18, 2006

I Admit It; I Am Going To Watch The OJ Interview

......but I will turn the channel during the commercials.

I watched the trial and I was disgusted by the outcome. They couldn't have have got a dumber jury if they tried. I don't know for a fact, but I would be willing to guess that most if not all the jury were Young Earth Creationists because they were the most gullible anti-science people put together outside of an Evangelical Church.

This is where I get to show my Atheist morality. Many people are convinced that God will take care of OJ, when his time comes. Well I'm not on that list. I can't say how I would react to such a tragic situation, and I hope I never will, but I'm pretty sure that if I experienced what the Goldman or Brown family experienced, I doubt OJ would be prancing around on golf courses, to say the least. I'm an eye for an eye type of guy.

Now back to the interview. I am fascinated by liars and frauds on TV and on the internet. I'm big on psychology too. I won't be buying the book though, not that this is a big deal......I rarely buy books.

One thing I've heard regarding what OJ is saying these days is that IF he did it, there was an accomplice. Guess what?, I believe there was, and he (or she, probably a he though) can be tried from what I understand.

Is this OJ's way of getting back at the accomplice? I wonder who it is. Probably Al Cowlings. Maybe Kato Kaelin. Perhaps the deceased Robert Kardashian. Remember those names? It was the trial of the century.

I can wait for the interview, but I'm definitely watching it.

November 15, 2006

The Arab Word For Humiliation Is Victory

It seems that the Arab world loves to take English words and give absurd definitions to them to suit their purposes. Take words like anti-semite, land, and victory for instance. For more, see this mini-dictionary.
Aside from that, for the most part, they take realities like 9/11 and the Palestinian plight, and find all kinds of other ways to point fingers, blame others, and invent conspiracy theories. The culture does not take responsibilities for their own actions ever, it seems.
This video cracks me up. Like a fossil find that fits evolution theory, this interview with Samir 'Ubeid, an Iraqi researcher living in Europe, completely fits my above observations and expectations. He is talking about Nobel prizes and the fact that Jews have won 167 of them, while Arabs have won 4.

Here is the hilarious transcript:

Samir 'Ubeid: I don’t call it the Nobel prize – I call it the "Hubal" [idol] prize.

Interviewer: Hubal?

Samir 'Ubeid: Yes, because it often encourages heresy. It encourages attacks against the heritage, and encourages those who scorn their people and their culture. The proof is that it was awarded recently to Pamuk, who had encouraged civil strife, which might preoccupy Turkey and the Muslims in general. He held Turkey responsible for what the Ottoman state did, when he referred to the massacre of the Armenians.


Interviewer: In other words, if you are a traitor to your country, you deserve this prize.

Samir 'Ubeid: If you are a traitor to your country, and a heretic, who curses his Prophet, you deserve a Nobel Prize.


Why has the prize been awarded to 167 Jews, and to only four Arabs out of 380 million Arabs – and all four are considered traitors? For example, Al-Sadat got the prize during the normalization process, and as a price for Camp David, together with Begin, who carried out the Deir Yassin massacre, and who was in the "Hagana" gangs. Later, the prize was awarded to [Ahmad] Al-Zewail, in order to buy his invention, and Al-Zewail has disappeared since.

Interviewer: You mean the Egyptian Ahmad Al-Zewail?

Samir 'Ubeid: Yes, the Egyptian chemist. The prize was also awarded to Mohamed ElBaradei, and in this case, it is soaked in the blood of the Iraqi children and people.


Mother Teresa was brought, along with a group of people like her…

Interviewer: Some say the prize was awarded to her for her missionary activity in Africa, India, and so on...

Samir 'Ubeid: Let’s assume she was righteous, according to the logic of the media, which is now controlled by the Jews and Hollywood. When they awarded the prize to Teresa, they were trying to award an "artificial hymen" or "artificial honor" to this prize. My colleague said that there is democracy. What democracy is there, if out of 1.5 billion Chinese, only two or three were awarded the Nobel? If you examine the Russian scientists and writers, who shook the world with their literature and their knowledge... What about Sakharov, what about Tolstoy? In addition...

Interviewer: But Sakharov was awarded the Nobel prize.

Samir 'Ubeid: I meant Chekhov. Chekhov! Chekhov!


Are we Arabs not included in the transfer of the scientific genetic code? We, the descendants of Al-Khawarizmi, Al-Jahez, Al-Razi, Avicenna, and Ibn Al-Haytham – are we all born idiots? Is there not a single scientist among us? Are we not included in the genetic code? Is intelligence not transferred down among us Arabs?

Interviewer: Scientific creativity occurs in freedom and democracy, brother.

Samir 'Ubeid: Democracy does not explain how it was awarded to 167 Jews, from among those 15 million scattered around the world, while abandoning 1.5 billion Chinese, a billion Indians, and 380 million Arabs. This is racism.


The [Grameen] bank for the poor won the prize because some of its shareholders are giants like Haliburton and others.


They infiltrated this bank, which became in the pocket of the Freemasons. This prize stems from the core of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.


Maybe one should revisit one of my more infamous posts. I answered a lot of Samir's key questions in it.

I have an idea, maybe a "Palestinian scientist" can find the unique gene that allows a Palestinian to retain refugee status over 4 generations.

The Arab world is a culture in denial.

H/T: Villagers With Torches and Eye on the World.

November 13, 2006


I haven't posted much about Iraq. The war there is getting a lot of negative press these day to say the least. So I decided to get a second opinion. I got the idea to interview a soldier actually stationed in Iraq right now, by email.
Yes this is totally legit, I know this guy from the Yahoo message boards, and his emails confirm the legitimacy.

Ok here we go.

If you want, you can say a little about yourself as an intro (and why
you agreed to this interview), and what is your job, and the nature of
your stay in Iraq?

My name is Chris and I'm in the Army National Guard. I am deployed to Baghdad, Iraq as the S5 (Civil Military Operations Officer) for an Infantry Battalion. This is my second deployment in 4 years, my first being to Bosnia in 2003.

As far as being CMO officer, it is different than anything I've been trained to do. We are trained for combat operations but the whole CMO thing is strictly hearts and minds. It's a great change of pace and has given me a chance to talk with people, learn the culture, and gain an understanding of the people we're here to help.

I'm still not clear what a CMOO does during a usual day, can you
expand on it a little more?
What differentiates a CMO from others deployed?

My day is usually spent either looking at projects, talking to local national contractors about future projects or paying contractors for completed projects. Not to mention the typical meetings that plague any organization with Power Point slides and the entire mess. To be honest, the US Army would come to a dead stop if Power Point ever went dead....

When other Infantry Companies go out on patrol where they kick in doors to snatch bad guys, or get illegal weapons, or whatever their mission is for that day, I go behind them to see if there is anything they need for support. Not all Iraqis are bad. A VAST majority of them are very good people and want the "wahabbis" or the "militia" out of their neighborhoods.

I guess you could say that we play "good cop/bad cop". HAHA

I spend a considerable time "outside the wire" talking with tribal leaders, village leaders or influential people in our Area of Operations (AO). We have meetings so that we can organize our efforts and not duplicate our efforts.

What is the general feeling amongst Iraqis when it comes to the US
presence in Iraq? Are they resentful? Can they see things improving?
Does it depend on how religious they are and what religion they
are....does that make a huge difference?

When we talk with the locals, that's one of the key issues we try to hit. It is divided between Shiite and Sunni lines. Shiites are glad we invaded and are ready for us to get the Hell out. Sunnis are upset with us for invading but don't want us to leave until there is stability and security.

When the news reports that a "majority" of Iraqis want us out, keep in mind that Shiites ARE the majority. If we leave, today, the Shiite Militia will be the force in this country. Backed by Shiites from a less favorable country, they will cause havoc in Iraq.

To say that the people are resentful is probably not right. These people seem more resentful to each other than to the US military. The US has only been here for three years. Saddam oppressed people for generations.

Since the Shiites are the majority and they want you out, how is
stabilization going to be possible? Can you see a light at the end of
the tunnel? Can the Shiites and Sunnis see a light at the end of the

I'll tell you what it looks like from my foxhole. The VAST majority of ALL Iraqis want security and stability. Not all Shiites are in the Militia and not all Sunnis are in the insurgency. I do see a light at the end. Just today, I worked with a major to set up his own security measures so that he can protect his village from either one. They want peace as bad as anyone. They love their children as much as we love ours. They don't want them growing up in this crap and we don't want to send ours any more to fight in it.

Stabilization is very possible. We just need to make sure we are able to go after the bad guys with extreme prejudice and we can NOT leave until we fully accomplish this mission.

Do you think your views are shared by the majority of the enlisted?

Each soldier will share a different experience. The enlisted guys who talk to the people would probably agree with me. They may be a little less diplomatic about it but I would think we would match up pretty well.

To be honest, our views are not as important as the mission we must carry out.

Are the Iraqis who want peace helpful in identifying where the bad guys are?

90% of any information that has led us to bad guys, IED's, dead bodies, or weapons caches have come from the locals we work with.

They want stability and are not afraid to stand up for it. Of course, it's also easier to stand up when you know there is an American patrol coming through your town about 4-6 times a day....

Do the locals generally think that US invasion was for liberation
purposes, oil, or because of Israel? Or a combination? Do you guys
get called Zionists?

The public thinks we either came here to liberate them or to just get rid of Saddam. Oil has never been brought up and we are a separate entity from Israel as far as they're concerned. I've never been called a Zionist. None of our soldiers have been either, to my knowledge. As a matter of fact, the only time anyone has even mentioned "Jew" was during a meeting when the interpreter got upset with the "target" we were talking to. The guy asked my interpreter what his religion was and he told him, "I'm a Jew." That was just to tick him off, I think.


How safe do you feel on a moment to moment and daily basis? You must
always be on the look out for potential danger. How much does this
occupy your mind?

No one is complacent. You always look for snipers and possible IED's. Those are the biggest threats to us, today. I've learned that I can socially multi-task. While I'm talking to kids on the streets, I can also notice people moving in and out of buildings and scan rooftops.

It's constantly on your mind. I will say that there are places I feel more secure than others.

Can you see Iraq being the next Turkey? Or is that too hopeful to
imagine in our lifetime?

Honestly, that's beyond my comprehension at this point. Would I LIKE to see that? Sure. At the current levels, this country will be this way at some level for at least a generation. Turkey may be too much to hope for but maybe something on the lines of Lebanon or Egypt.

Of course, keep in mind, that's just my opinion.

I know you are a Christian, but do you know any Atheist or Agnostic
soldiers? Do you believe there are no Atheists in a foxhole? I
already know you couldn't imagine yourself being one:)

I'm very much Christian, you're right.

Are there really any atheists in a foxhole? Sure. When you don't rely on God, the only thing you have left is each other. It's someone you can see, touch, hear, and on long hot days, smell...LOL!

There are soldiers with me who don't care either way. They don't consider themselves atheists but that's because they just don't think about it at all. Our personal religious beliefs rarely come into play.

Now for a statement by me. I completely see why America had to invade
an Arab Muslim country. The USA had to show that they are not all
talk and 9/11 put Arab Muslims on the map. If the wrong hands get a
WMD, they will most likely use it. Saddam was not playing ball, and
Iraq was invaded. Overall, I believe it to have been completely
necessary. It will cause other countries to think twice. And the
invasion from what I've seen has led to step forward in Westernizing
many of the Arab Muslim nations over the last 3 years. If not Iraq,
it was going to have to be someone else, but Iraq was a very good
Yes innocents had to die, but they had to die in Japan in 1945. If
not, eventually someone was going to use the A bomb. It was
inevitable. And look at the reform that came with the 1945 bombings,
not to mention it ended a war.
But the reality is that the reason the invasion of Iraq was allowed to
happen was because of the WMD rumours. I'm not saying anyone lied,
but there was a lot of misinformation.
How do you feel about the way the government got the war started?

In my personal opinion, if President Bush had come on TV and said, "Saddam has thumbed his nose at the UN and the International Community for the last time. We're going in."

I would have been happy with that.

I have absolutely NO problem with why we went in. I'm glad we did and would back doing it again.

By the way....

Iraq started it. We just finished it. Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990. That's what started this cycle.

I knew I worded the question wrong right after I wrote it:) I think I
have enough to put in a blog post now. Thanks for the interview, and
stay safe, finish the job, and don't buy the farm.

Thanks, I really enjoyed it.

Send me a link to the blog. I would like to read the bashing that is coming when you post it!




How was that for an interview? I heard 60 Minutes is looking.....What? Too soon?

November 10, 2006


Mark Glenn shared his emails with probably one of his bestest buddies, a vile character by the name of Alex "the Assmonkey" James. I won't post his email because it is just standard lies that were cut and pasted out of something like David

But his email prompted a response by me which refuted a few of the "issues" brought up by self-loathing retard Alex. Monkeyboy Mark Glenn is my target so to speak, and he again started emailing me today.

Mark said:

Are you still there? I thought you got flushed down the toilet where you belong, you piece of shit.

I can only imagine how fulfilling your life must be...angry all the time, thinking dark thoughts, justifying every form of evil that can be dreamt up as long as it benefits you and your pathetic excuse for a soul.

It's no wonder you people hated Jesus and continue to hate him to this day--he is everything you aren't and you are everything he isn't. It's no wonder you hate women as well, since they are the vehicles for carrying your own reproductive seed, and as hate-filled as you are you live with a never-ending longing for death.

What's the matter, your Jewish mother didn't love you enough? Too much berating and criticism and this is what it has produced, an angry, spiteful, foul-mouthed jerk who can only draw attention to himself by acting like a porn-star-wannabe? Please keep up the posts, you are bearing the ugliness of who you really are to thousands of people around the world even as we speak, and with every vomitous word that comes out of your mouth you are validating all the reasons why people such as yourself have been 'poisecuted' throughout the centuries. You and those who think like you are the anti-Christ and you will meet your end soon enough, and it won't be amoment too soon as far as the rest of the world is concerned.

'Do not assume that I have come to bring peace...I did not come to bring peace, but the sword...'
-- Jesus of Nazareth
My reply:

I don't think dark thoughts. I have a great life. I don't use
religion as a crutch and I don't hate Jesus, he never existed. I
don't hate women. I love them. At least 50% of my readership is
women, and they are highly educated and find your ilk repulsive. It
is you that is full of hate, but you are too retarded to realize it.
It must be due to those phenomenal Arab genes you posess. LMAOAY.

I'm glad I was able to teach you how to spell "ugliness"

You wretched piece of shit. Leave the West. We don't need vermin like you,

-The Atheist Jew
His reply:

This just keeps getting better and better...
Jesus never existed, and I suppose you discovered this all by your lonesome with that superios intellect of yours? Wow, it's no wonder you are so puffed up on yourself and haughty.

You know how you can tell when you are dealing with someone who can't stand to hear the truth in an argument? They resort to name calling. Ad hominem attacks, just as your Pharisee forefathers did to jesus. They couldn't beat him in an argument using logic, so that had to resort to calling names, like a bunch of spoiled, petulent children. Those are your genes, my friend. You are just like them.

Taught me to spell 'ugliness'? Is this really the best you can do? Is this your idea of raising your fist and declaring victory? What are you, 14 years old or something? You certainly act like one with all your adolescent name calling.

'Leave the West'--well, I have news for you, my friend, it will probably be YOU leaving, just as has taken place for the last 14 centuries. Eventually the body will spit you out, just as it always has, so keep a suitcase handy, that is, if you are lucky enough to get out of here alive, because when people figure out how much trouble you and people like you have caused, there will be an open season on you, just as there always has been.

And I for one cannot wait to see it...Like a public execution of a murderer or a rapist...and there will be no one to mourn you, and the worms will celebrate for the new meal they have just been given.

My reply:

You are just stupid and hypocritical beyond belief.
Ad hominem's: In your last post you called me a piece of SHIT....imbecile.

There is no evidence Jesus existed. There were 42 historians who
wrote between 1-35 AD and not one word mentioned Jesus. There should
be lots of evidence but none exists. In fact all evidence leads to
Paul inventing Jesus around 50-60 AD.

You have no truths. Not one. And thanks for your emails. I post
them on my blog where you are disgusting people. One person said that
he used to think getting people to go visit Auschwitz was silly, until
he read your emails. Thanks again. You are making a difference.
Keep up the good work.

And leave the West. We don't need filthy verrmin like you. And you
will be exposed further. You can take that to the bank, so I would
watch it with the threats about your pipe dreams of the next Jewish are a piece of shit....and I hope your children
aren't brainwashed by you.....or their existence on this earth will be
as worthless as yours.

-The Atheist Jew

The Assmonkey Mark Glenn again replied:

As I said, it just keeps getting better and better...

'No evidence Jesus existed'-- I suppose you also believe that the earth is flat and that leeches cure sickness.

What are you, some high-school drop out or something? The only thing I can figure is that you are still living with your parents, as this is the only rational explanation a to why someone like you would be home at this hour rather than out working for a living.

By the way, what do you make of people like Israel Shahak, Israel Shamir, Benjamen Freedman and others who say that the reason for all the 'poisecution' of the Jews is because of their own behavior? Oh, wait, don't tell me, let me guess--'SELF-HATING JEWS' right?
Anything except the obvious, huh? You are despised because you are a despicable people. You lie and cheat. You steal and you murder, just as Jesus said, and the obviousness of this is all around the world, and particularly in the Middle East where you murder people for sport. The only reason why there is this thing known as the West is because you people were driven out of Palestine in 70 AD and have been forced to mind you p's and q's ever since, and now that you have returned the world has been turned upsiade own...

... but not to worry, because 'the changes-they-are-a comin' and you know this which is why you and the rest like you are shitting all over yourselves in fear. 'Anti-Semitism'--ha, what a joke. you are as semitic as I am uneducated. If you were as smart as you say you are, you would know that you are just mongrel scum from southern Russia. Your ancestors never set foot in Judea and they have been driven out of every cuontry they lived in for the last 14 centures because they refuse to get along with others, and you are living proof of that.

'Holocaust'? only for people like you. For others though who want freedom from the paralizing and debilitating Judaic mindset, I celebrate them, good friends of mine who have detoxofied themselves of judaic thinking and have joined the rest of humanity. Oh, yes, I know, those 'self-haters'...

I won't take up any more of your time, since I know that watching child pornography is a big thing with you. Besides, I have gotten enough material from the posts you have sent. you would not believe how effective they are in opening people's eyes as to what 'being Jewish' is really all about.


My reply:

I have a great job and it affords me the luxury of mostly working out
of my home. And the hours are great too.

There is absolutely no evidence Jesus exists, but then again, you are
not into fact, evidence, or reality as anyone with a brain can tell by
your rhetoric.

I thought I am not a Jew. I am an Atheist. Why do you keep calling
me a Jew and implying I am a Jew.

And I have all kinds of middle eastern blood. But you love denying
reality. It goes against your propaganda. If you see my pic at my
blog, you'll see I am most likely darker than you.....and especially
your kids, if you are indeed the father of all of them. Your life is
a lie, so I'm sure you attracted liars to be close to you. You should
check your children's DNA to make sure they are all yours.

I think you are projecting. You are self-loathing vermin most likely
holding back his urges to view child pornography on the internet. Why
did you leave teaching? Does your community know about you yet?
They will. Very soon.

Leave the West, you vermin. We don't need your self-loathing ilk here,

-The Atheist Jew

I have a feeling the twerp Mark Glenn and his entourage of imbeciles are not done yet. I will keep those interested posted on this blog.

Update: Alex the Impotent emailed me.

Alex said:

Mr. Atheist Jew,

As described in the Bible by Yeshua-Jesus, you are the Babylonian Synagogue of Satan.
Your fellow Jews have been exposing you all over the Internet.

You need to repent about your lies and fabrications.

You will be accountable to God.

We will keep exposing your filth.

Your homeland is Southern Russia.


My reply:

Alex, you piece of garbage.
Jesus never existed. God doesn't exist. You feel so inferieor to
Jews that you obsess about Jews 24/7 and there is a Jew hiding under
your bed.

I don't lie. I've never been to Russia. I'm third generation
Canadian. You are an imbecile. Did your father teach you that you
are inferior to Jews, or did you teach yourself?

Eat Shit And Die

-The Atheist Jew

November 9, 2006


What is it with you people? Must you ALWAYS resort to name-calling, vulgarity and adolescent-level discourse? Where is that 'superior' sense of intellect that you are all famous for possessing?

I haven't bothered to read your blog and won't and you you know why? Because if I wanted to get the 'jewish' point of view on anything, all I need to do is turn on the tv, open the newspaper or listen to the radio. Besides, the title is a dead give-away anyway--'bacon/eating/atheist/jew--I can just imagine the marvelous sort of stuff that must be in there--jewish superiority, hatred for all others (especially those who oppose you, such as the arabs) And of course the typical foul-mouthed, four-letter word dissertations that people such as you are famous for displaying since your intellects are too clouded with poison to be able to debate anything on a logical premise.

Oh, and, by the way, since you are an atheist, as the title of your blob of a blog indicates, what makes you a jew anyway? Don't tell me it's that "jewish race thing' as if there were such a thing. News flash for you--Judaism is not a race, its a way of thinking, just as are Christianity, Islam, Buddhism or whatnot. Once again, you have to hide behind something rather than come out in the open and debate it in an intellectually honest way. But then, what more would a rational person expect? Judaism is no body's friend, and turns it's victims into maniacs.

Another news flash for you--If you want to know why there was this thing known as the Holocaust, just go look inthe mirror and read your blog. People like you are what lead decent people into driving you out or subjecting you to some sort of extra-judicial action rooted in self-preservation, and as long as people like you continue to exist, there will always be this thing known as 'anti-semitism' as if you had a drop of real semitic blood in your eastern european veins at all.

Now, as much as I love to engage in dialogue of this type, the truth is that I have more inportant things to do than deal with mentally dysfunctioal types such as you. if I wanted your opinion, I would have asked for it. you can go on jabbering about this or that on that piece of used toilet paper you call or whatever it is called, but don't waste your time with any kind of insults thrown my way or whatever. As I said, I have more important things to do than deal with the kind of 'superior thinking' that you are trying to sell humanity, so don;t even bother leaving your comments or responding to this.

If you really are that interested in dialogue though, I will be happy to share your comments, email address and blog information with the 10,000 or so muslims I have on my mailing list. That might keep you busy for a while.

Mother must be so proud of you

Go have a BLT on me!



My reply:

Monkeyboy, you don't even realize how braindead you are or how much of a hypocrite. You say I can't be a Jew because I'm an Atheist but still say "your people" in your email.

You are a joke. Leave the West, go back to Arabia.

We don't need your filthy ilk here.

Luckily, you are impotent.

As far as your Arab buddies go, give em my bog addy. I can take the heat, I'm not a coward like you. I won''t even delete their comments.

You are a sick mother fucker. But then again the Lebanese have an average IQ average of 83, and it comes out in your writings.

Fuck off and die,

-The Atheist Jew


His reply:

You know why it is so easy to write pieces that show the real uglyniess of the Judaic mindset?

Because within 5 minutes of it hitting the airwaves, there is someone like you who comes along and validates everything that was written. All the banality, all the baseness, all the adolescent, childish, impish remarks. You can't argue like a rational, intelligent person, and so instead you have to screech like some ghettozied, vioelnt, inbred, backwards trash who is unwelcome in every country where he goes.

And this is the way it has always been, hasn't it? and thus it will always be, until you people learn how to get drag yourselves out of the ghetto and along with the rest of humanity.

Impotent? What a joke, I have a large family to succeed me, unlike you. Coward? Another joke. I am writing pieces out there in the open for all the world (and in particular you and your judaic gangster ilk) to see.

save your time, don't write back.



My reply:

Impotent, as in politically impotent. Impotent in the mind. You really are a stupid freak.

Your mentality is why Arabs can't win a war. You are a common retard.

You have no argument. You call me a Jew, then you say I can't be a Jew. You have nothing but rhetoric. Nothing but an imbecile. But I don't mind exposing you. I have a rather large audience of readers. They are all getting chuckles from reading your bullshit. And most aren't even Jewish.

Blah blah blah....Jews get kicked out because of bigots like you. You have an inferior complex, maybe because you are an Arab, I don't know. See a psychiatrist. You are sick.

As far as arguing with you goes....I rebutted you on my blog. But you are too much of a coward to read it.

America said no to Arabs on the Ports Deal.....not no to Jews.

1.4 billion Arabs are humiliated by 13 million Jews. You wear your shame pathetically.

Fuck off and die

-The Atheist Jew

He replied yet again:

Arabs are winning the war. Their societies haven't been corrupted with Jewish filth the way that the west has. That is why you and all your bloodthirsty cousins have to resort to sending American mercenaries out to slaughter them.

'Common retard' I have spent 5 years as a teacher at the high school level and now I guest lecture at colleges and international conferences around the world and speak half a dozen languages. You talk like a typical foul mouthed jerk who reads nothing but hustler all day.

'Large audience of readers'--yes, probably birds of a feather, which is why I am obviously not impressed with this little medal of honor you have decided to pin on your lapel.
Jews do get kicked out because of people like you, not by bigots. When a hostile foreign object invades the body and makes it sick, a healthy body drives it out through vomiting, coughing, sneezing, and diareah, which is what the jews have aleways been--the bdy's refuse. And when it can't expel it, it kills it in the 'oven' of the body, meaning a high temperature, or if you prefer to use a more sensitive term, 'holocaust.'

I will not read your blog because I am not into intellectual and spiritual pornography.

Arabs humiliated by a few Jews? No, the arabs are being murdered by a few Jews who have blackmailed and bribed the most powerful nation on the earth into giving them everything they demand. If the US stopped acting as a host to these parasties, Israel would shrivel up like a balloon, and you know this. What does Israel make? nothing. What is its business? Sex slaves and pornography, and that is about it.

'Fuck off and die'--well, we're all dead men, aren't we? I guess the big difference between you and me is that when I die I will be surrounded by loved ones who will honor my memory, whereas with you you will only be missed by a few others of your gangster ilk who will have to go somewhere else to get their daily dose of atheist, racist garbage.


My reply:

A high school teacher? Whoopty Doo. I know lots of high school teachers who are crackpots like you. You can't even spell "ugliness." Is English your second language?

Arabs haven't won a war in centuries. If you like Arabia so much and hate Jews so much, why don't you move. We don't need you here. Your ilk is polluting our air.

And no, the Iraq war had very little if anything to do with Israel. If America were fighting for Israel they would have bypassed Iraq for Iran. Again, you just have lies and pretend they are facts.

Jews got kicked out because generally they are a succesful minority. Forced to take jobs out of the mainstream. And when regimes change, the easiest people to steal from and kick out are the successful minority. But that is logical....and logic is foreign to you.

You have kids. Hopefully they didn't inherit your self loathing and inferiority and low IQ. If they did they did and think like you, they should have been aborted.

Does your community know about you? I'm pretty sure they soon will.

You are a sad sad twerp,

-The Atheist Jew

November 8, 2006


I couldn't find Mark's picture, but I imagine he looks like this:

Update 1: I left a comment on the wussies blog, but he deleted mine as well as a few others that didn't condone his words.
Update 2: It appears Mark is of Lebanese ancestry, and he wrote a piece that where he basically says that the West will be better off if it is Islamized.
When I read this post over at Elder of Ziyon, my first reaction was, why give Mark Glenn, retarded assmonkey supreme, any attention whatsoever. But I realized that one of the purposes I've invented for blogging is that I have a need to expose idiocy. And Mark Glenn has to be one of the largest hypocritical imbeciles I've run across in some time. More important, his piece of rhetoric, Judaism Is Nobody's Friend, completely justifies Israel's existence.

I'm not going to bother reading the other drek on his blog or his past writings Crescent and Cross, but what I gather from Elder's past articles is that this demented little twerp Mark somehow tries to say that Islam and Christianity are completey harmonious with each other, except the Jews spoil this wonderful potential marriage.

Let me just rip Mark apart based on his newest entry.

The first part of the article illustrates why he is coming out of the anti-semitic closet in stating what most intelligent people know already, that Zionist is just a PC word used by anti-semites to describe dirty filthy Joooooos.

He could have saved about 10 paragraphs of crappy writing and just made the point.

Someone should also clue him in on the fact that Israel has been on the defensive since 1948, and if the Arabs dropped their guns, there would be no more bloodshed. But Mark makes it clear by the end of the article that facts aren't as important as dead Jews.

He says laughable things like: Islam has been painted as being ‘this’ and ‘that’ for several years since the ’war against terror’
Mark, in case you don't know, almost every war on the planet these days involves Islam. 9/11 was done by Muslims. When the cartoons came out and painted Muslims as being intolerant, many Muslims became intolerant.

Yes, Christianity has also been lampooned, but they seem to be good sports about it.

Mark, you have to understand that Christians and Muslims will be lampooned more than Jews because there are 1.4 billion Muslims and over 2 billion Christians on the planet, and less than 15 million Jews. Do the math Mark. Buddhists don't even get lampooned that much. It isn't just the Jews. Well except for Muslim countries that have no problem placing anti-semitic cartoons. Oh yeah, us Jews lampoon ourselves all the time. I guess that doesn't count.

Mark is a retard:

He states that Zionism is only a biproduct of a much larger thing: The cancer known as Judaism. Herzl was an Atheist. Do you mean ethnic Jews, or do you mean the religion?

He sort of clarifies it with this idiotic statement:

At best the Jews (most of whom are not religious anyway, short of prostrating themselves before the strange gods of money, comfort, and political power) make up a few tens of millions, and yet we are supposed to treat the whole subject of their ‘religion’ as if it were some kind of precious gem of incalculable monetary value?
I get it, you don't really mean Judaism, you mean Jews. Ethnic Jews, Atheist Jews like me... and of course the fake religious Jews.

Of course what would Mark be without denying the Holocaust:

"the fact that we have spent so much time wet-nursing the egos of one small minority of people who are said to have had a rough time during WWII we have allowed WWIII to be born."

OK, now he gets all religious on us.

"Judaism has been at war with us for over 2,000 years, ever since this man named Jesus of Nazareth came and blew the lid open on what Judaism‘s real agenda was. Judaism is a declaration of war and manifested by thousands upon thousands of acts of intentional malice directed by Rabbinical generals against the rest within the non-Jewish world in matters involving money, business, politics, and culture."
It is clear that Judaism was here first. So by saying that Judaism declared war on Christianity is similar to saying that Christianity declared war on the Mormons. Oh yeah, have I mentioned this yet? JESUS NEVER EXISTED. He was invented by Paul in a successful attempt to start a new cult that was an offshoot of Judaism. All quotes that were supposed to be attributed to Jesus were written way after the fact by Christians who at the time found it beneficial to malign Jews.

"the man I most admire and revere, meaning Jesus of Nazareth"

I love the fact that Jesus is the man he admires most. It makes sense to me. (I can't stop laughing while I am typing this).

OK, now for some more assmonkey rhetoric:

It does not belong in the same class with other faiths dedicated to improving the individual and making him or her more pleasing to the one responsible for all creation. It does not make people better, it makes them worse. It is like a highly radioactive element that can bring nothing but sickness and eventual death. It does not bring liberation but rather enslavement. It does not foster humility (the first step in breaking down the spirit of haughtiness that impedes the reform of the person) but rather feeds the ego. It is not about God, right vs. wrong, or the ‘thou shalts’ and ‘thou shalt nots’ in a general sense.
What the hell is he talking about? First off, Judaism is full of rights and wrongs and thou shalts and shalt nots. Even us Atheist Jews have that stuff ingrained in us. How the hell does he justify Islam over Judaism? I'd say he is dumber than a box or rocks, but I don't want to insult rocks.

"Notice, it is not called ‘Yahwehism, ‘Jehovaism‘, ‘God-Ism’ , ‘Moral Behaviorism’ or even ‘Old Testamentism‘, but rather ‘Judah-ism‘."
Notice Christianity isn't called Yahwhism, Jehovaism, etc. Retard.

"It’s primary concern is with the tribe of Judah and those who make up the tribe, meaning the Jews."
Wow, and what is Christianity and Islam mainly concerned with. LMAO

It is ‘their baby’ and the goose that laid the golden egg. It is a winning lottery ticket that never expires, their ‘get-out-of-jail-free’ card and their Genie in a bottle that grants them every material, monetary and political wish. It is like a highway with no speed limits nor guard rails and where there are no rules. This is why we find that in Judaism’s rule book–meaning the Talmud–that everything is geared towards what benefits the tribe, and in particular, the rabbis who ‘cannot be punished with Hell’ and before whose writings and sayings ‘God stands in awe’. It is not as much concerned with bringing the soul to the paradise of the next world it is concerned with making a paradise of this one, the rights and well-being of non-Jews be damned in the process.
Please give examples. The rhetoric here is mind numbing. And how does this differ exactly from Christianity and other religions? Oh yeah, you forgot Jews have lots of rules, you just choose to ignore them.

"While the other two Middle Eastern faiths that are Judaism’s organic enemies–meaning Christianity and Islam–elevate the virtues of humility, charity and righteousness, Judaism not only elevates, but institutionalizes and legislates the vices of haughtiness, supremacism and callous disregard for other human beings. It is the codified mindset of mankind’s first murderer, Cain, who slew his brother Abel over reasons of envy and economics. Gentiles exist to serve the Jews. Rape of gentile children, murder, lying, theft, usury, all these things that have been condemned in every other religion around the world are given full sanction in Judaism when it benefits the tribe."
Wow, this dude needs help. Oh and "Islam elevates the virtues of humility, charity and righteousness" ROFLMAO I think he has Judaism and Islam mixed up. Like I said, he needs help.

As far as Christianity is concerned, it was obvious that Jesus Christ was as interested in the haughty, elitist, immoral and callous tenets of Judaism as Judaism was interested in His message of humility, righteousness, and charity. This is the reason why Judaism put Christ to death 2,000 years ago and why it continues to gloat over his ignominious end to this day. If indeed Christianity sprang forth from Judaism, why then does Judaism maintain to this very microsecond that Jesus was a sorcerer and a sexual deviant who suffers in hell by being boiled in a caldron of semen and feces for daring to oppose the Rabbis and that His holy mother Miriam was a ‘harlot who mated with carpenters’ ?
Really, do Jews say this? I say Jesus never existed. And if I'm wrong and he did exist, he was just a regular dude who lived and died. Nothing special.

"…And of course, the often-heard ‘I am Jewish and I never ran into any of these supposed teachings of the Talmud’…

I do not doubt that this is indeed the case. I know many such persons myself, people who are as much victims of the scheming and plotting of the Judaic priesthood as everyone else."
OK, you are confusing me. Are you mad at ethnic Jews or religious Jews?

"But what we have to keep in mind is that they are good people in spite of the fact that they were raised as Jews. They are good people because of the fact that they chose to retain their humanity despite the best efforts of their rabbis and other leaders to rob them of it. They chose to follow the laws of God rather than the laws of men, because in Judaism, the Rabbis are God and to disobey them is to disobey Him."
So it is the Rabbis who corrupt Jews. But most Jews are not supposed to be religious accroding to you. Where did dirty Jews get their humanity from? Are we born with humanity? Rabbis are Gods? That is fricken hysterical. Ask 2 Rabbis a question about religion or ethics and you'll get three different answers.

Now read this. If this isn't insanity, I don't know what is:

"And as far as the average Jew being exposed to the teachings of the Talmud, it should be obvious why the Rabbis would not want such a thing taking place. There is an old saying that ‘3 people can keep a secret if 2 of them are dead,’ meaning that conspiracies oftentimes fall apart because of someone’s big mouth. The more moving parts there are to a machine the more susceptible it is to breakdown. It is highly likely that if the average Jew were schooled in the Talmud and its criminal agenda that such persons–for no other reason than fear for their own lives–would have nothing to do with implementing the agenda of their leaders, and thus the Jewish agenda would be like a Man-O-War at sea with no sails, no ors and no gunpowder."

Let me get this straight. Rabbis have a conspiracy theory going to perpetuate the bad things that are in the Talmud and they somehow get all the Jews in the world to understand them without having to use the Talmud as a reference. You know what. This dude belongs in a mental institution.

His most hypocritical line (he is far too gone to get the irony):

"I can’t imagine a more miserable existence than living without a conscience and not being able to feel compassion for the suffering of innocent others. What could be a more hellish prison than being robbed of the life-saving salves of humility and righteousness, the same divine qualities of the human spirit that Judaism devours as if it were a cancer?"

The puke has a dream:

"I dream of the day when there is no Israel and it has been ‘wiped off of the map’ as the President of Iran once noted. No more dead Palestinians and Iraqis. The western world going about its business of implementing the principles taught by its founder, jesus of Nazareth. No threat of nuclear holocaust and our children sleeping safely at night with a veritable future ahead of them…"
Umm, you really don't get Islam, do you? Or has your hatred of Jews clouded your already demented mind?

"Judaism is nobody’s friend, and the sooner that the rest of us–Jew and non-Jew alike–come to realize this, the better off we will be. Get rid of it. It is a cancer. Cut is out and throw it away, as Jesus instructed that we do. It has never and will never be of any benefit to mankind. We cannot live in any kind of ‘peaceful co-existence’ with it. It is a declaration of war, and as long as it exists out there, mankind will never have peace."
What a bunch of bullshit.

This complete imbecile uses no facts; only rhetoric, baseless claims, false analogies, and slanderous lies in order to make his point:


November 7, 2006

I Always Knew Me And Kermit The Frog Had A Bond

He finally has come out and admitted that he is an Atheist:

"There is no God, and you know it Folks!"

-The Infidel Guy

"I've always been an atheist," says Asia. "Science explains everything."

-Porn Star, Asia Carrera.

Asia's favorite jokes about religion:

1. God said, "Let there be light." Nothing happened for a few moments. Then God said, "Who the heck am I talking to?"

2. Give a man a fish, and you'll feed him for a day. Give him a religion, and he'll starve to death while praying for a fish.

3. A little boy prayed for a bike. Then he realized God doesn't work that way so he stole a bike and asked for forgiveness.

Asia went through a horrible ordeal in June when the man to whom she was pregnant to, died in a car crash. She has an internet journal. You can read about it here starting on June 11th.

I wonder if she is still an Atheist. One more thing, she is supposedly a member of Mensa.

November 4, 2006

In Canada, We Get South Park Episodes Late

But now, thanks to Youtube, I don't feel like a some second class Westerner.

South Park makes fun of Atheists. Here is part one of Go God Go. Some of it is hilarious, some of it is funny, and some of it agitates me in a very uncomfortable sort of way. Youtube will most likely take this down fast, so watch it while you can. It comes in three short segments:

Part two will be aired in the USA next week. Hopefully the Youtubians will allow me to view it as well. I get over 200 friggin channels but the Canadian Comedy Central channel is two to three months behind. Time to get back in my igloo.

November 2, 2006

Was Ted Haggard Just Trying To Cure Male Prostitute?

Update: I just had to add this cartoon. Click the cartoon to enlarge it.

Oh, do I hope these allegations are true. Think Progress has linked a video news story that states a male prostitute alleges that he was paid for sex by the main pastor of GW Bush, Ted Haggard. And that this business affair lasted for 3 years.


Haggard is one of the biggest Evangelical leaders in America...which means the world when we are talking Evangelical Christians.

Haggard has stated that if one is a homosexual, you can still get to heaven as long as you don't do the dirty:

"Where should Christians draw the line when it comes to homosexuality? To answer that question I talked to Pastor Ted Haggard who is the President of the National Association of Evangelicals, and aide to President George W. Bush, and head pastor at New Life Church in Colorado Springs, Colorado.

“All of us were in sin. All of us needed redemption,” said Haggard. “If a person has homosexual tendencies... they need to practice abstinence just as a single heterosexual would need to practice abstinence. The difference would be that the single heterosexual could get married and become sexually active with their heterosexual partner whereas, the homosexual would have to practice spirit control and self-restraint throughout the balance of their lifetime.

In I Corinthians 6:9-10 it clearly puts the issue of homosexuality on the table. In the New International Version of The Bible it says that “homosexual offenders” will not inherit the Kingdom of God. It would be easy for someone to say that homosexuals will not inherit the Kingdom of God. However, The Bible doesn’t say that. The Bible says “offenders”. Therefore, if someone claims to have been born a homosexual, they are not committing homosexual sins until they have comitted a homosexual act or “offense”.'

If the allegations are true, I guess Haggard isn't going to heaven, unless of course he converts to Catholicism. Then he just has to confess his sins. And Ted, homosexuals can still get married to women and have kids. You did.

I'm laughing while I'm typing this post. Again, if the story is true, it just solidifies my theory that those who shout the loudest against homosexuality and gay marriage are fighting their own "homosexual demons."

If you watch the video at Think Progress, you'll notice that Haggard is looking up to the right. This is a sign that one is thinking up a lie.

One of the main reasons I'm smiling is that Ted Haggard is an ignorant and dishonest Fundy, especially when it comes to evolution.

Here again is Richard Dawkins interviewing Ted from the Root Of All Evil flick:

******UPDATE, UPDATE, UPDATE*************

Looks like Haggard quit as fearless leader of the National Association of Reality Deniers

Sorry Mike, but this is really making my day.

***********UPDATE NUMBER TWO***************

Ted confesses. And Fox News is totally ignoring this story on TV. Cowards.