tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post115756532053672360..comments2023-10-20T05:48:35.458-04:00Comments on THE ATHEIST JEW: We Are Prewired To Be SuperstitiousUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger64125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post-1158104516582009432006-09-12T19:41:00.000-04:002006-09-12T19:41:00.000-04:00Mad Zionist,Who said anything about ethnic cleansi...Mad Zionist,<BR/><BR/>Who said anything about ethnic cleansing? Is n't ityour own beliefs which are focussed on that issue, what with it being your ultimate goal? Isn't that right, the Jews are the chosen right?<BR/><BR/>Regarding your ID point it is just plain invalid. Provide one reason why ID should be considered? You can't. You have absolutely no way of differentiating your ID hypothesis from the hypothesis that the entire universe just spotaneously existed exactlyt as it is 5 seconds ago and that all of our memories are false or an infinite number of other theories that have absolutely no suggestive evidence. So why should ID be singled out of all those infinite options and given special treatment? The answer to that is of course your faith and your faith also provides absolutely no suggestive evidence. It seem impossible for you to grasp that very simple point.<BR/><BR/>It is simply your opinion, and ill-informed one at that, that macroevolution is b is based on hypothesis and not fact. It is supported by absolutely eveyrliving thing and eabsolutely every non-living thing that has been found preserved. Not one single life form on this planet does not fit into the theory. Previosussly you belittled the link I sent you becuase the example of not finding hominid remains in the Jurassic strata was too wide and simple as a prediction. The example was illustrative for stupid and uneducated people to understand. In fact hundreds of predictions of significant precision and been born out by evidence later discovered. You ignore the massive flaws in your argument and ignore the literrally incredible amount of evidence, starting with all existing life on this planet, that fits the theory of evolution. Your opinion is thus utterly disconnected from the facts.<BR/><BR/>So back to the ethnic clensing. No, I don't think you should be killed. Yes, I do think that you should have legal restraint placed upon you of what idiot prejudices and missinformation you can promote to children, your political opinion with regards to education should be entirely ignored and you should probably have to pass a knowledge test prior to voting. You are an irresponsible thinker, unconcerned by the evidence and the facts, absolutely blinded by your ridiculous belief in the supernatural, and I don't see any reason why those that can quite clearly see and demonstrate that you are quite mad should have to put up with you retarding their society by having equal rights to influence it. If you drive a car drunk you lose your license because you endanger yourself and others and you have demonstrated your lack of ability to responsibly control that machine. Do I think that "respecting peoples beliefs" is a valid reason to leave you drunk on irrational faith with equal access as any other to the controls of society then the answer is certainly a no. You are wrong. You are demonstrably wrong. Your reasoning is demonstrably deeply flawed. There is no way that it is rational to let you steer society and more than it is right to let the severely mentally disabled work as neurosurgeons. You lack the education and the capabilities for the job at hand. You lack the ability to reason.chooseDoubthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14892003265288803666noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post-1158046954329638972006-09-12T03:42:00.000-04:002006-09-12T03:42:00.000-04:00As long as you reject it out of knowledge and not ...As long as you reject it out of knowledge and not ignornace, MZ. If you have researched the subject to the full (and that does not mean reading every article in answeringgenesis) and still find it wanting, fine.<BR/><BR/>It sounds to me though like you haven't done that.<BR/><BR/>That isn't surprising as it is a massive subject which required many dedicated hours to get your head around.<BR/><BR/>It would require the same level of study to understand quantum physics. But for some reason, even though this area of science is much further "out there", there are very few theists determined to persuade people it is wrong.<BR/><BR/>I don't understand why theiets don't take on all scientific subjects they are baffled by.Simonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13905592870063005287noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post-1157988779336010472006-09-11T11:32:00.000-04:002006-09-11T11:32:00.000-04:00Choosedoubt,So, you want to ethnically cleanse the...Choosedoubt,<BR/><BR/>So, you want to ethnically cleanse the world of all who believe in God, huh? Hmmm...sounds like you've got your head on straight. Have a nice life "Stalin on steroids", for I will not be communicating with you ever again, as you've been revealed to be the worst of all the atheist stereotypes. The jihad you are on to force-convert the world to your religion is as scary as the moslem scum. I assume you are planning to hijack a jet and fly it into the Vatican, so hopefully you'll be unsuccessful in your mission, you crazy, zealot fool. Toodloo.<BR/><BR/>Regarding ID, let me again say that I am not the expert who has advanced the cause, merely I am trying to show that because we don't have all the answers yet, it should be permissable to question whether or not a Prime Mover is involved in the puzzle. <BR/><BR/>End of discussion, guys. I am not an opponent of evolution, just someone who has reservations to the absoluteness of macro-evolution since it is based less on fact and more on hypothesis. Disagree if you like, even have a fit, but that won't prevent me from doubting the conclusiveness of the findings on this level of the evolutionary debate. Call them "holes", call them "gaps", call them "most likely scenarios", but, either way, I cannot currently accept where evolutionary science stands on the origins of life and radical species change. <BR/><BR/>-MZMad Zionisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02368389951636950238noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post-1157963980588271762006-09-11T04:39:00.000-04:002006-09-11T04:39:00.000-04:00It's pointless having a debate where we try to pro...It's pointless having a debate where we try to prove one side or the other. Lets look at the weight of evidence. <BR/><BR/>Well, all the existing evidence is on the side of an earth over 4 billion years old, where life started and evolved to create the diversity of species today.<BR/><BR/>If each bit of evidence were a goal scored in a soccer match, the current scoreline in the match between Old Earth Evolutionists and Young earth Creationists would be about 43,756,354 - 0.<BR/><BR/>I'm not exaggerating to make a point.<BR/><BR/>MZ, things are looking bad for your team. Still, I'm sure there still a chance for you to make a come-back. If you can make it to half time with the score under 50 mil against, a tough-love half-time pep talk from your manager should get your boys back into shape. Hope he doesn't lose it and flood the place again, though.Simonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13905592870063005287noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post-1157952651541915802006-09-11T01:30:00.000-04:002006-09-11T01:30:00.000-04:00CD:I can't imagine why sane people don't organise ...CD:<BR/><B>I can't imagine why sane people don't organise seriously to put a stop to it. They should all be on medication the instant that someone finds a cure for stupid.</B><BR/>Can't DO that, dude. This is America. They're entitled to their opinions, even if they're wrong.<BR/>You can't just shut people down for disagreeing.<BR/>Problem w/a free country is, everyone's got rights. Whether we like it or not.Krystalline Apostatehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09044558668644447375noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post-1157937887836370052006-09-10T21:24:00.000-04:002006-09-10T21:24:00.000-04:00None so ignorant as those with the "ultimate answe...None so ignorant as those with the "ultimate answer".<BR/><BR/>Sorry for the previous ranting but at times I feel a powerful need to vent a little about how truly vile and irresponsible theism is. With not one single fact or ability to rebutt science and reason they smuggly wash their hands of the carnage their idiot beliefs cause. I can't imagine why sane people don't organise seriously to put a stop to it. They should all be on medication the instant that someone finds a cure for stupid.chooseDoubthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14892003265288803666noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post-1157935094199923902006-09-10T20:38:00.000-04:002006-09-10T20:38:00.000-04:00BEAJ:I'd like to know what the serious holes are t...BEAJ:<BR/><B>I'd like to know what the serious holes are too.</B><BR/>Oh, he's got nuthin', except some sweeping generalizations, probably a few "Gee, a scientist shows doubt by saying 'shoulda woulda, coulda'". He'll probably point out the 'theory' isn't seamless, it's called a 'theory', you know the drill.<BR/>Same old dreck. False dilemmas all.<BR/>"None so blind as those will not listen", hehehehe.Krystalline Apostatehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09044558668644447375noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post-1157924920411474262006-09-10T17:48:00.000-04:002006-09-10T17:48:00.000-04:00I'd like to know what the serious holes are too. ...I'd like to know what the serious holes are too. Maybe I can be swayed to at least thinking evolution isn't a sure thing. I've looked though, and I can't find any.Baconeaterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11134934827966299989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post-1157923922050471952006-09-10T17:32:00.000-04:002006-09-10T17:32:00.000-04:00Mad Zionist,How about pointing out one of these se...Mad Zionist,<BR/><BR/>How about pointing out one of these serious holes?<BR/><BR/>If you can't do that then the discussion on evolution is over and you bravely disagreeing with more than 99.8% of all bioligists has failed to pay off for you - you lost.<BR/><BR/>Want to argue about any other aspect of your nonsense?chooseDoubthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14892003265288803666noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post-1157922733572242702006-09-10T17:12:00.000-04:002006-09-10T17:12:00.000-04:00MZ:You think only with your arrogance. I prefer to...MZ:<BR/><B>You think only with your arrogance. I prefer to argue with rational minds, not xenophobic religious extremists who are one step from the straight jacket.</B><BR/>Here I am.<BR/>If you're all finished w/your poisoning the well/ad hominem tactics.<BR/>Attack the argument, not the arguer, if you please.<BR/>Unless that's all you've got. It seems that's the entirety of your repertoire.Krystalline Apostatehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09044558668644447375noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post-1157920551838567332006-09-10T16:35:00.000-04:002006-09-10T16:35:00.000-04:00RE: spelling.I use the english spelling versions, ...RE: spelling.<BR/><BR/>I use the english spelling versions, because I am australian.<BR/><BR/>(See, I knew that wouldn't make sense..lol )beepbeepitsmehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12931640447011071849noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post-1157920381192276632006-09-10T16:33:00.000-04:002006-09-10T16:33:00.000-04:00Beep, I would accept "I don't know" as a legitimat...Beep, I would accept "I don't know" as a legitimate reaction. I just don't like the total cocksure arrogance about macro-evolution when serious holes still remain.Mad Zionisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02368389951636950238noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post-1157919776225827342006-09-10T16:22:00.000-04:002006-09-10T16:22:00.000-04:00RE md: The only answer is NEVER god. The honest a...RE md: The only answer is NEVER god. The honest answer is "I don't know."beepbeepitsmehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12931640447011071849noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post-1157917911606919172006-09-10T15:51:00.000-04:002006-09-10T15:51:00.000-04:00The reading you provided is a dream come true for ...The reading you provided is a dream come true for critics of evolutionary science. The idea that the apologists for evolution even concede they are basing it on loose-knit guesswork founded on the fact that fossil records of humans aren't found in the Jurassic period makes those who find fault in macro-evolution that much more emboldened. The follow up point that no life has been created from an inanimate object proves that evolution must be right is pure hypocricy. Perhaps when a creationist tells you that because evolution fails to show a species originating at all means that the only ansswer is God you'll see that you're no different.<BR/><BR/>Try again. Your hocus-pocus junk science is looking even worse now than before you made that post. What's next: astrology?Mad Zionisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02368389951636950238noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post-1157916126994978692006-09-10T15:22:00.000-04:002006-09-10T15:22:00.000-04:00Mad Zionist,Number 3 from the link I previously po...Mad Zionist,<BR/><BR/>Number 3 from the link I previously posted (so you didn't read it):<BR/><BR/><I><B>3. Evolution is unscientific, because it is not testable or falsifiable. It makes claims about events that were not observed and can never be re-created.</B><BR/><BR/>This blanket dismissal of evolution ignores important distinctions that divide the field into at least two broad areas: microevolution and macroevolution. Microevolution looks at changes within species over time--changes that may be preludes to speciation, the origin of new species. Macroevolution studies how taxonomic groups above the level of species change. Its evidence draws frequently from the fossil record and DNA comparisons to reconstruct how various organisms may be related.<BR/><BR/>These days even most creationists acknowledge that microevolution has been upheld by tests in the laboratory (as in studies of cells, plants and fruit flies) and in the field (as in Grant's studies of evolving beak shapes among Galápagos finches). Natural selection and other mechanisms--such as chromosomal changes, symbiosis and hybridization--can drive profound changes in populations over time.<BR/><BR/>The historical nature of macroevolutionary study involves inference from fossils and DNA rather than direct observation. Yet in the historical sciences (which include astronomy, geology and archaeology, as well as evolutionary biology), hypotheses can still be tested by checking whether they accord with physical evidence and whether they lead to verifiable predictions about future discoveries. For instance, evolution implies that between the earliest-known ancestors of humans (roughly five million years old) and the appearance of anatomically modern humans (about 100,000 years ago), one should find a succession of hominid creatures with features progressively less apelike and more modern, which is indeed what the fossil record shows. But one should not--and does not--find modern human fossils embedded in strata from the Jurassic period (144 million years ago). Evolutionary biology routinely makes predictions far more refined and precise than this, and researchers test them constantly.<BR/><BR/>Evolution could be disproved in other ways, too. If we could document the spontaneous generation of just one complex life-form from inanimate matter, then at least a few creatures seen in the fossil record might have originated this way. If superintelligent aliens appeared and claimed credit for creating life on earth (or even particular species), the purely evolutionary explanation would be cast in doubt. But no one has yet produced such evidence.<BR/><BR/>It should be noted that the idea of falsifiability as the defining characteristic of science originated with philosopher Karl Popper in the 1930s. More recent elaborations on his thinking have expanded the narrowest interpretation of his principle precisely because it would eliminate too many branches of clearly scientific endeavor.</I><BR/><BR/>So in other words, the absolutely unchallenged conformity of the fossil record and every living species with the theory is positive evidence that the theory is correct. Genetic evidence is positive evidence in favour of the theory. The fact that the theory has lead to prediction which have later been verrified is postive evidence in favour of the theory. You don't have to sit there and watch a species change into another in front of your eyes to verrify the theory any more than you have to directly observe an electron to prove its exitence. But please feel free to ignore the evidence once again and remain convinced that you, from your absolute lack of actual reference, are indeed correct.chooseDoubthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14892003265288803666noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post-1157914531012965182006-09-10T14:55:00.000-04:002006-09-10T14:55:00.000-04:00Bacon, The origin of life, and the ability of muta...Bacon, <BR/><BR/>The origin of life, and the ability of mutations to fundamentally alter a species where it evolves to a new species. I don't contest minor changes in species development being a result of the evolutionary process. The big changes, however, remain unproven.Mad Zionisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02368389951636950238noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post-1157908240642246002006-09-10T13:10:00.000-04:002006-09-10T13:10:00.000-04:00He's evaded every request to provide anything to s...He's evaded every request to provide anything to support any of his assertions.chooseDoubthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14892003265288803666noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post-1157905870470025262006-09-10T12:31:00.000-04:002006-09-10T12:31:00.000-04:00MZ, what facts are demonstrated enough to shed dou...MZ, what facts are demonstrated enough to shed doubt on evolution? You evaded my post to you from earlier this morning.Baconeaterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11134934827966299989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post-1157904343879006832006-09-10T12:05:00.000-04:002006-09-10T12:05:00.000-04:00I have at no time ever expressed having a faith. I...<I>I have at no time ever expressed having a faith. I have several times explained that I have no faith.</I><BR/><BR/>And yet, you continue to rant about the omnicience of you dogma, and the evil of anyone who poses the tiniest doubt in your absoluteness. You make the moslems look open minded in comparison. Sorry, but your religious ferver is about as strong as any I have ever seen.<BR/><BR/><I>I have lived to date in 7 different countries.</I><BR/><BR/>Oh, well, never mind then. Had I known your all-knowingness had lived in so many countries I'd have changed my views a long time ago. <BR/><BR/><I>I find it hard to understand how being in accordance with the FACTS can be considered extremism.</I><BR/><BR/>Precisely my point. When facts are unable to be demonstrated enough to prove the central position of the theory then it leaves question marks. Why you can't see this seems to be the central flaw in your argument. I could just as easily argue in defense of Darwin if I were speaking to someone who was so zealous he denied the possibility Darwin was right, just as I can argue with someone who has chosen darwin as his God and refuses to allow the tiniest dissent to the contrary.<BR/><BR/><I>Now run a long and lick your gods anus.</I> <BR/><BR/>Very objective and sensible of you. Nicely argued and clearly well thought out. No way to make a good counterpoint to those FACTS of yours.Mad Zionisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02368389951636950238noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post-1157901975645764512006-09-10T11:26:00.000-04:002006-09-10T11:26:00.000-04:00BTWm about being a xenophobic religious extremist:...BTWm about being a xenophobic religious extremist:<BR/><BR/>1) I have lived to date in 7 different countries. It's hard to be xenophobic when practically your while life is spent being a foreigner.<BR/><BR/>2) I have no religion.<BR/><BR/>3) I find it hard to understand how being in accordance with the FACTS can be considered extremism.<BR/><BR/>Now run a long and lick your gods anus like a good little theist.chooseDoubthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14892003265288803666noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post-1157901719796362732006-09-10T11:21:00.000-04:002006-09-10T11:21:00.000-04:00Then argue with a rational response, such as one o...Then argue with a rational response, such as one of these mysterious reasons you claim to have but never share. I keep mentioning I have no faith. I have at no time ever expressed having a faith. I have several times explained that I have no faith. But this is your only rertort; describing an understanding of peer reviewed research as a faith. Is this just another case of the facts bouncing off the outside of your skull? Try letting some in, you might like it.chooseDoubthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14892003265288803666noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post-1157901457984984852006-09-10T11:17:00.000-04:002006-09-10T11:17:00.000-04:00I am the enemy of mankind. BAHAHAHAH!!You are the...I am the enemy of mankind. BAHAHAHAH!!<BR/><BR/>You are the savior of all mankind.<BR/>BWHAHAHWAH!!<BR/><BR/>Wow. You may get the award for zealot of the year at this pace. Take a pill, call your mommy, have a cookie, and do your daily affirmation in the mirror until the drool on your frothing mouth stops.<BR/><BR/>You think only with your arrogance. I prefer to argue with rational minds, not xenophobic religious extremists who are one step from the straight jacket. Darwin, your God, has quite the hold over you, eh? <BR/><BR/>Breathe...Mad Zionisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02368389951636950238noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post-1157899423228872722006-09-10T10:43:00.000-04:002006-09-10T10:43:00.000-04:00Mad Zionist - provide one argument, just one, in f...Mad Zionist - provide one argument, just one, in favour of your nonsense? "Mystical Darwinism"? How is it mystical? Do the many thousands of published and peer reviewed papers mean nothing? If you want to debate stick to what you can demonstrate and stop making these wild and absurd correlations between your own baseless belief system and demonstrable knowledge. I suppose these many thousands of peer reviewed papers are just "prophecy" to you though. Can you explain how?<BR/><BR/>Of course not, because you can't explain anything at all unless you can some how slide your prime mover in to make it make sense for your retarded understanding. All I ask is for one piece of evidence suggesting that evolution is false. You provide none. I ask for you to share the proof of your miraculous Torah that you previously claimed existed. You share nothing except more empty statements, not even daring to retread that terriroty. Put up or shut up. Present your case or present your arse outside the hall of serious debate because you don’t belong inside.<BR/><BR/>"PS., I have never stated that evolution is false and that fundamentalist creationism is true. I would suggest you argue this point with someone else who takes such a position. I merely have exposed your closed mindedness and bigotry by suggesting that evolution as Darwin claimed still has many holes that continue to leave us with more than enough room for uncertainty."<BR/><BR/>Blah, blah, blah, you have stated that evolution is false. You have stated that the only sensible conclusion because is a prime mover - a designer - so you have taken such a position. You made some vague suggestions to why evolution is wrong and I provided you with a link that debunks those suggestions. Did you even read it? You continue to call atheism a faith; did you even read the post I pointed you to? Is it that you are too stupid to understand simple logic and reasoning or is it that your theist brainwash left you free and clean of the capability to reason? I mean, what is wrong with you? You're mentally disabled as far as I can see and it's horrific that fools like you are permitted to continue to promote your madness.<BR/><BR/>My moniker is very accurate, but you wouldn't stand a chance of understanding why because your philosophy is just too basic. Let’s face it, you’re an idiot. You take your ultimate answer from ignorant ancients with absolutely not one shred of supporting or suggestive evidence and you think that is a defensible position. In fact you think it is the only sensible conclusion. Really, what an idiot you are. <BR/><BR/>Your room for uncertainty on evolution is artificially created and not in accordance with the facts. Your room for uncertainty on ID and your prime mover hypothesis is artificially removed and absolutely not permitted by or in accordance with the facts. But of course, you cannot see this. You prefer to believe in the fairy tales of historically non-existent events such as the exodus and Noah’s ark. You deny evolution and yet support the nonsense text that demands that all of the colours and types of people on this planet came from just one couple, Adam and Eve, and that every type of animal on this planet went through a single door into a single boat at a rate of more than 30 per second to account for the species that currently exist and that the disaster they were escaping was totally unrecorded in the continuous records of civilizations that existed at the time. What an absolute and uncompromising idiot you are.<BR/><BR/>You demand that your opinion is meaningful and fail constantly to provide any slight or suggestive reason why it should be given any credence above suggesting that Polar Bears came from Pluto and yet you openly refute thousands of independent and mutually supportive studies that demonstrate unfailingly that the theory of evolution is entirely in accordance with absolutely every known fact. Can you not provide a single observable trait about reality that backs up your nonsense assertions learnt from the back of a long out of date theist cereal packet?<BR/><BR/>Ignorance is not an art form, it’s a disability. The inability to understand critical thinking, note I don’t even suggest yet attempting to employ it, is a severe mental disability on your part. It saddens me that people such as yourself will abuse the next generation by pushing your worthless and harmful nonsense upon the young. It sickens me in fact. You are the enemy of all mankind because you promote superstition above reason. You are the enemy of mankind because you promote that it is acceptable to make decisions based on idiot fairy tales and factually incorrect lies and ignore that the damage caused by that is immense.<BR/><BR/>Don’t let me make this look too light because I do not consider it that way. In a very real sense I consider the blood to be on your hands and that you are too arrogant or pig stupid to be able to hold yourself accountable for your thinking and your understanding. You raise yourself on to the pedestal of the one true ignorance and from your vantage point of pure fantasy you shit on the reality of human suffering and ignorance that your idiocy requires. And your only excuse for this is the dogma you were poisoned with by your own misled parents and elders for which you have never and will never provide a single supporting fact.<BR/><BR/>You and your theism are a disease. It is a societal sickness that has reigned in an unchecked pandemic since accepting that some things are unknown was first hidden by the rhetoric of idiots with “answers” who sought power over idiots with no answers. It’s a travesty of ignorance – the blind and greedy leading the blind and stupid – and you, like a second hand car salesman’s wet dream, bought into every line of the pitch. And you can provide not one reason to say why.<BR/><BR/>You bought the bullshit and the cost was your intelligence, your honesty and any real reason to respect yourself. You are a clown and quite frankly your defence of ignorance disgusts me by revealing in greater depth just how ignorant you truly are.<BR/><BR/>Now come back with one reason why ID should be considered, as I keep asking you to. Come back with one reason to even begin to think that your prime mover exists. You can’t. So give me one reason why your worthless rhetoric should continue to be allowed to pollute the minds and politics of this world?<BR/><BR/>There is none. Your opinions are a negative in every single way. They are negative in their alignment to reality and every scientific investigation ever. They are a negative in terms of personal honesty and understanding and they are a brutal negative in terms of governing society by reason instead of biased mysticism that should have been left back in the ignorance of the dark ages, if not long before. You are a fool and yet you can provide not one excuse for why you are a fool. I can provide you one reason, although not one excuse, for why you are a fool and it is just one word – faith.<BR/><BR/>Now provide some facts that dispute the facts already established. The facts to date establish clearly that you are an ignorant fool.<BR/><BR/>So bring it on.chooseDoubthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14892003265288803666noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post-1157897621487037902006-09-10T10:13:00.000-04:002006-09-10T10:13:00.000-04:00MZ, what holes specifically?Again, Darwin came up ...MZ, what holes specifically?<BR/>Again, Darwin came up with his overall theory 150 years ago.<BR/><BR/>Every new biological discovery reinforces evolution. I have yet to see one refute it.<BR/><BR/>What uncertainty are you talking about? Be specific please.<BR/><BR/>There was a lot of uncertainty during biblical times. Pi was estimated at 3, the sun revolved aroung the flat earth, and people new apples fell to the ground, but figured it was because of God and not gravity.<BR/><BR/>Holes do not prove God. As time goes on we find less and less holes.Baconeaterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11134934827966299989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post-1157894747921879852006-09-10T09:25:00.000-04:002006-09-10T09:25:00.000-04:00PS., I have never stated that evolution is false a...PS., I have never stated that evolution is false and that fundamentalist creationism is true. I would suggest you argue this point with someone else who takes such a position. I merely have exposed your closed mindedness and bigotry by suggesting that evolution as Darwin claimed still has many holes that continue to leave us with more than enough room for uncertainty. <BR/><BR/>Your moniker is not very accurate, I'm afraid.Mad Zionisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02368389951636950238noreply@blogger.com