tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post5599181740017997673..comments2023-10-20T05:48:35.458-04:00Comments on THE ATHEIST JEW: Peer Reviewed Creation Science Website Now UpUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post-68010731149998457442008-04-05T06:54:00.000-04:002008-04-05T06:54:00.000-04:00We thought you might be interested --SCIENCE AND S...We thought you might be interested --<BR/><BR/><BR/>SCIENCE AND SCIENTIST<BR/>Inquiring into the Origin of Matter and Life<BR/>January-March 2008<BR/><BR/>Bhaktivedanata Institute's latest quarterly newsletter<BR/>is now available online.<BR/><BR/>You can download the January-March 2008 issue from:<BR/>http://scienceandscientist.org/current.php <BR/><BR/>______________________________ ______________________________ __<BR/> <BR/>What's it about?<BR/><BR/>Modern science has generally been directed toward investigating<BR/>the material world, excluding consideration of the conscious<BR/>scientist who is essential to the whole process, since, of<BR/>course, the very existence of the scientific endeavor itself <BR/>depends upon consciousness. Complete scientific knowledge must<BR/>consequently include both objective science and subjective<BR/>consciousness.<BR/> <BR/> <BR/>In addition to other programs, Bhaktivedanta Institute's Science<BR/>and Scientist Newsletter is humbly offered to inspire scientists<BR/>and scholars to contribute their sincere efforts toward<BR/>developing this grand synthesis. The result will be valuable not <BR/>only for helping to better understand the "hard" problems of<BR/>science such as the nature and origin of life and the cosmos, the<BR/>mind-brain connection, artificial intelligence, etc. But the<BR/>pressing problems of ethics in science, world peace, and <BR/>interfaith dialog will also benefit from a more inclusive<BR/>scientific worldview.<BR/> <BR/> <BR/>In our modern era science and religion are the predominating<BR/>influences determining the fate of mankind. Promoting and<BR/>developing a culture of harmony between such diverse fields has<BR/>the potential to expand our conception of reality and advance <BR/>human knowledge in the new millennium, in which it is said the <BR/>study of life will be pre-eminent. Let us welcome the dawn of<BR/>that new epoch with great hope and determined endeavor.<BR/>______________________________ ______________________________ __<BR/> <BR/> <BR/>Newsletter Homepage: http://www.scienceandscientist.org <BR/> <BR/> <BR/>Newsletter Subscription:<BR/>http://www.scienceandscientist.org/subscribe.html <BR/> <BR/><BR/>Please send comments/questions to:<BR/>editors@scienceandscientist.orgjagahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17135129894664975819noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post-76867850963038755962008-02-05T12:05:00.000-05:002008-02-05T12:05:00.000-05:00What to say? Yawn...Amazing how these "Righteous P...What to say? Yawn...<BR/><BR/>Amazing how these "Righteous People" resort to quack science to try and convince the gullible that "Every Word Is True". Needless to say, it works: it's much easier to convince laymen with a pot-pourri of scientific sounding "stuff" that confirms the belief systems they've been imbibed with since birth, even if the science is a flimsy smoke screen at best, and plain old snake oil merchandise a la Ken Hovind, at worst.<BR/><BR/>Unfortunately, real science has to keep an open mind (there are drawbacks to everything) and so considerable time and effort will be spent on debunking their silly arguments.Gerthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07752117708821629614noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post-67356871502677203762008-02-04T15:44:00.000-05:002008-02-04T15:44:00.000-05:00Technically we need bacteria to digest food. It's ...Technically we need bacteria to digest food. It's in our gut. A supreme being wouldn't need to eat, since he's divine, so he wouldn't need bacteria. Besides, I think we're only supposed to look like God on the outside. <BR/><BR/>Of course there's mitochondria in every single cell, which evolved from bacteria, but if evolution never happened, mitochondria can't have evolved from anything and thus was always just as it is now. Whee!<BR/><BR/>"The natural symbiosis of microbes with other creatures is the norm."<BR/><BR/>FAIL. The <I>vast</I> majority of microbes are not connected to larger organisms. Pretty much every non-sterilized surface is coated in free-living bacteria and prokaryotes, and they exist deep in the topsoil as well. The ocean is filled with them. The vast majority of microbes that we've <I>cataloged</I> have been from living creatures, specifically humans, but there are probably quadrillions of species of bacteria, more, out there that we don't have a way to culture or aren't interested enough in. So the science isn't just ignored, the bits they throw in are false.<BR/><BR/>Must be nice to be a creation "scientist." You only have to read one book.Basioranahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03735917076649770499noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post-7350117343677781912008-01-31T15:12:00.000-05:002008-01-31T15:12:00.000-05:00But, but....the Bible says that illnesses are caus...But, but....the Bible says that illnesses are caused by demons/evil spirits! This research is satanic!!<BR/><BR/>*snicker*<BR/><BR/>Foolish theistfucks.Evolved Rationalisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10145578845908854985noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post-83751993716865568682008-01-30T05:43:00.000-05:002008-01-30T05:43:00.000-05:00What else needs to be said?Answers in Genesis neve...What else needs to be said?<BR/><BR/>Answers in Genesis never ceases to amaze me with their dishonesty and complete lack of regard for the scientific method.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08770580993286550937noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post-6787795269960744612008-01-30T01:30:00.000-05:002008-01-30T01:30:00.000-05:00I love it. When I found out about this a bit ago,...I love it. When I found out about this a bit ago, they had ... three things (two papers and that symposium thing, or whatever it was). Today I just downloaded the entire Jan issue of PLOS biology with more articles. I'm sure there will be a lot more "scientific" articles published soon. Maybe some day, there will even by an ID paper. LOL.<BR/><BR/>The very idea that this might be considered peer-reviewed is sad. Of course, an EBSCO search yesterday gave me (as peer reviewed) some Journal of Religion and Psychical Research (IIRC). When all your peers are crackpots too, maybe that does make it "peer reviewed".Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post-61781365258248054232008-01-30T00:32:00.000-05:002008-01-30T00:32:00.000-05:00I am sponsoring a contest to see who can be the fi...I am sponsoring a contest to see who can be the first to get a crank paper published in Answers in Genesis new abomination...er, peer-reviewed journal. <A HREF="http://hjhop.blogspot.com/2008/01/happy-fatwah-on-answers-in-genesis.html" REL="nofollow">Stop by my site for details.</A><BR/><BR/>HJBinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09911928552839958713noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post-17930175162666282392008-01-29T23:24:00.000-05:002008-01-29T23:24:00.000-05:00The day God created plagues, he created microbes.The day God created plagues, he created microbes.Frank Partisanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03536211653082893030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10199920.post-68064350485771458212008-01-29T22:29:00.000-05:002008-01-29T22:29:00.000-05:00I've been working on a Dickhead Award and I think ...I've been working on a Dickhead Award and I think the first recipient will be the Creationist Website you refer to.Lexcenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17856993035719777231noreply@blogger.com