Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), Canada's spy agency has warned: a terror attack on Canadian soil is "now probable."
It seem that the Religion of Peace has found a reason to hate us. Stupid us. We obviously haven't done everything we can to make Canada a Muslim country yet.
Looks like we need to be taught a lesson. Some innocent people need to die, so we can learn.
Thank you Liberal Moonbats, for allowing terror cells to grow in Canada. Until there is a Mosque on every street corner, us Canadians will have to watch our backs.
One more thing I've realized, our troops in Afghanistan are much braver than me. I'm a wimp (a keyboard warrior) in comparison to the Western ground soldiers fighting terror. These soldiers are fighting for our freedom and our future. The sickness of Islam must be defeated and reformed. Most Canadians haven't realized it yet, but according to CSIS we will understand it soon enough.
Aaron, from Aaron's Case, on his main page, speaks for many of us when he says: "Hey, I'm just a friendly family guy and relatively high-profile blogger who objects to a religion that would dhimmify all non-adherants and make them pay jizya for the privilege of remaining alive under Muslim rule. It pains me deeply that there has yet to be even a rally of even 1000 Muslims out of the 1.2 billion adherants anywhere on earth to renounce violent jihad or even to protest the widespread practice of female genital mutilation and honor killing seemingly unique to that faith throughout the Islamic world.".....but publish a cartoon of Mohammed and watch the shit fly.
Steve, you are such a Dhimmiwit.
ReplyDeleteMaybe we can set up some Mosques in the backrooms of some our strip joints.
ReplyDelete"ah the politics of fear... i missed it"
ReplyDeleteFrom Jihad Steve
So I guess speed limits and seatbelt laws are just "the politics of fear"
why do we need air traffic controllers? What are we... pussies?
If you fuckers would quit speaking Canadian.....
ReplyDeleteBacon: I too am awaiting a Muslim protest against Musim violence. I won't hold my breath.
ReplyDeleteWhat is the reason that there are no Muslim protests against Muslim violence?
ReplyDeleteDo those Muslims that may have the ability to reason, maybe even have a conscience, fear the reprisals if they did protest. Or are there very few Muslims who are actually opposed to Islamic terrorism?
Do those Muslims that may have the ability to reason, maybe even have a conscience, fear the reprisals if they did protest.
ReplyDeleteFear of reprisals from a small and insignificant cabal of extremists hiding under rocks in Waziristan? That doesn't make any sense.
Or are there very few Muslims who are actually opposed to Islamic terrorism?
Muslims are opposed to terrorism; that much is true. Spreading Islam by the sword is not considered "terrorism," but rather an "opening" of the world to Islam; or futuhat.
Something BEAJ said in the body of the post really stuck out at me:
It seem that the Religion of Peace has found a reason to hate us. Stupid us. We obviously haven't done everything we can to make Canada a Muslim country yet.
It may sound like a joke to us, but it's a reality to them. I've been reading a lot of Quranic commentary and Islamic jurisprudence as of late and one of the conceits I've come across is this: Muslims do not make war. Muslims are forced into war by the infidels' resistance to accept Islam.
The process of da 'wa is a peaceful one. You are invited to become a Muslim. It is your refusal to become a Muslim that forces the Muslims to war against you. Since the world's religion must be Islam and all its peoples must be Muslims, anyone who doesn't accept the call to Islam is considered a rebel.
So when BEAJ says they're upset at us because we haven't done everything to make Canada an Islamic polity, unfortunately, he is right. Islam cannot exist apart from its mission to convert the whole world; unless, of course, Muslims reject the pronouncements of Muhammad, the hadith and over 1400 years of jurisprudence. Good luck with that.
Pimpette, you forgot about the pressing issues about cartoon protests.
ReplyDeleteThey have more pressing issues, like keeping their jobs, fighting discrimination, and self defense.
ReplyDeleteHear that? Easily assauging the West's Islamophobia by renouncing "terrorism" and proving that Islam does not inherently promote violence against non-Muslims is NOT a pressing issue for our so-called "moderate" Muslims. They'd rather spend their time fighting "discrimation" rather than showing a legitimately distrustful populance that grounds for such scrutiny are unwarranted. With groups like CAIR speaking for Muslims, I can't say that I'm convinced that this is a matter of priority as much as one of dissimulation.
With Muslims being catered to at every juncture--whether it's toilets in British prisons being altered so they don't face Mecca or police being prevented from conducting raids on Muslim suspects during prayer time; authorities in Australia making "cultural" execptions for domestic abuse cases involving Muslims; mandatory Islamic studies for students in some American public schools; a media and a government that bends over backward to remind us that Islam is a religion of peace; and our right to freedom of speech and a free press being being taken sacrificed to Muslim sensibilities I'm not sure what Muslims have to fear. They certainly have nothing to fear from a tiny minority of extremists, right? I guess they have more important things to do rather than turning in those suspicious fellows who live and pray along side of them.
Britain is still suffering from the scant information they've been able to piece together about London bomings. It looks like a large population of Muslims in Britain are either too frightened of boogeyman or they just have better things to do -- like fighting the dirty looks they get from not cooperating with the authorities who are trying to find more information about the individuals who slaughtered 50 of their fellow citizens. (But I guess they'd have to consider them "fellow citizens" instead of unclean infidels, wouldn't they?)
And as BEAJ pointed out, sending millions of people to the streets threatening to unleash new Holocausts against Europe and America is hardly a productive use of time; nor does it make them look like anything other than a hostile foreign element that has no problem imposing their will--and their laws--on everyone else, provided they have the numbers to do it and a sufficient number of spineless non-Muslims, fearing that their embassies and printing presses will be burned to the ground, let them.
Commentpimpette,
ReplyDeleteSuras 2, 9, and 48 come to mind as chapters which contain instructions for violence against the un-believers. You may also reference history which, from the time of Muhammad, through the first 450 years of unprovoked Islamic conquests after Muhammad’s death and the spread of Islamic influence, by the sword, across the Middle East, the West and the Indian subcontinent thereafter, is replete with ample documentation published by Muslim jurists and Caliphs as to the Quranic inspiration and justification of their deeds. If you’re not up to the scholarship, you needn’t look any further than pronouncements made by Islamic leaders, be they Khomeini, Sistani, Gaddafi, bin Laden or Zarqawi, which all reference the Quran, the hadith and the example of Muhammad as legitimizing their viewpoints, and moreover, their justification killing and subjugating non-Muslims. Unless they’re talking about a different Quran I’m not aware of. (What the hell makes you so damn arrogant as to tell these people that they’re interpreting their religion wrong?)
And no, I do not have any problem explaining the relevance the time in which these verses were written and how that applies to them today. First, however, I must point out that you first ask me to point out these verses which purport to incite violence against non-Muslims, then, as a safety, knowing I just might know what I’m talking about, seek to diffuse their meaning by implying they’re out of date or not applicable to today. Make up your mind. Which is it? This is like when an apologist claims that Islam is not inherently violent then, in the next breath, says that Christianity is violent too. Well, which is it?
As to your question, I’d refer you to Quranic verse 9:29 and Sayyid Qutb’s commentary on it; it specifically relates to the issue of whether or not such a verse is relevant to today. Oh, and Qutb is only one of the most influential Islamic thinkers of modern times; quite precise and the literalist and quite brilliant, I must admit (but I’m sure you know better than he.) Though the verse 9:29 was written at the outset of a particular campaign, the fact that the call to Islam is timeless necessarily means the pronouncements therein are likewise timeless. Islam cannot exist in perpetuity with any other religious system; and jihad is the means to establish Islam’s unequivocal superiority over the world. If Muslims do not strive to fulfill those commandments, the whole is Islam is false (now try telling 1.5 billion people they’re full of it.)
These are not my words. I’m not making this stuff up. What I have over you, however, is the humility and open-mindedness to admit that not everyone thinks the way that I do. There’s a wealth of information at your disposal and I suggest you start seeking the answers to these questions yourself rather than arrogantly dismissing other peoples’ assertions outright without ever having done any of this “studying” yourself; you who know more about Islam than the people who practice it; you who seem to profess a certain amnesia or willful ignorance not just of the history of Islam, but with how it is practiced today. Unless YOU can name me an Islamic country that isn't hostile to non-Muslims and that doesn't justify its complete depravity with the Quran, hadith and examples of Muhammad, you should be quiet.
Steve, I guess since we can't beat em, we might as well join em. Are you a full fledged Muslim yet?, if you aren't I'm sure you are thinking about going Cat Stevens very soon.
ReplyDeleteDT, excellent comments. Very insightful and right to the point. I get it, so do my intelligent readers here I'm sure.
I also think Pimpette wants you.
Steve, first point, you are intellectually dishonest. I asked one question 3 times, and you refused to answer. You cherry pick points, and you make retarded inferences and conclusions based on your Arab controlled mindset.
ReplyDeleteNow, I am not talking about genocide. Again, I say defense. Until they wake up and reform.
Why is it on the onus of those whose innocents get attacked to be the good guys and bend? You have the same attitude with Hamas and the Palestinians as you do about suicide bombers. You have no concept of reality. Points made are completely lost on you.
Zionist Jordan destroyed you on your blog with common sense. But as usual it goes Whoooooooooooosh, right over your pea brain.
What is the point of debating you. You are a moron. Really.
DT made phenomenal points here. Pimpette spun them, but you ignore them, Jihad Steve the Dhimmiwit.
Pimpette, I get it. And no, I don't give much too much emphasis on the ugliness in any bible, and give people more credit than that....mostly.
ReplyDeleteSteve, again, you are putting words in my mouth, at least you are a consistant imbecile. Seriously Steve, you must love getting your ass kicked, because I don't see too many people who agree with you. You've been completely slammed and had your arguments destroyed, yet you keep coming back for more.
Pimpette, he made excellent points. You asked for an example, he gave you an example.
ReplyDeleteHe also brought up a point that Muslims have their priorities out of order. The fact noise was made over cartoons and very little noise over terror is ever made, is proof that either, Muslims are OK with terror or they don't realize what they need to do to improve their image and while doing so, they wouldn't have to worry so much about persecution.
The fact is that their silence is equated with acceptance of terror.
Sorry, but that is just the facts.
Keep dodging and making stuff up Jihad Steve. You are as transparent as a 3 dollar bill. Did you right your congressman about Darfur yet?
ReplyDeleteYou are a terror apologist with no feasible solution except to accept dhimmitude(and don't spin me and worry about my answer).
ReplyDeleteThat makes you Jihad Steve the Dhimmiwit.
You have it is ass backwards. Example Hamas, they state that they will not stop terrorizing Israel until Israel stops existing. They are the ones who make a feasible solution impossible.
ReplyDeleteWhat you call racism is me just analyzing the guts of why terrorism exists, it has nothing to do with a solution, it is an observation based on facts.
"Thank you Liberal Moonbats, for allowing terror cells to grow in Canada."
ReplyDeleteOh, it was the Liberals eh? Conservatives in the States didn't seem to help stop terror cells from growing there. And by the way CSIS shouldn't be making politically charged announcements - that just stinks. I'd rather my country's spy agency stick to spying instead of meddling in domestic political affairs so hypersensitive anti-liberals don't get into a tizzy every time someone says the word "terrorism".
Saskboy, when I say Liberal moonbats, I'm not talking about the Canadian polical party.
ReplyDeleteAlthough the Libs are way more terror cell friendly with their policies here than the PC's seem to be, but for an example of Liberal Moonbat see Steves posts.
I've already read it. Zionist Jordan and I destroyed you in the comment section. Jordan's points seem to go right over your head. You are a true idiot. I can't help insulting you by the way. I think your IQ is dropping with each post you make.
ReplyDeleteNot a bad logo, even Muslims themselves would be better off without (today's) Islam!
ReplyDeleteLook at pathetic Jordan, no matter how much they ("moderates" my ass)hate the Jews they are still not "Halal" enough in Hamas butchers' eyes.
ReplyDeleteUse the little L then, unless you're talking about the Liberal party of Canada, or starting a sentence about your "liberal mooonbats".
ReplyDeleteliberal moonbats suck
ReplyDeleteI remember that link. Out of 1.5 billion Muslims, I'm sure there are a few that denounce terrorist acts. Try finding Muslims condemning suicide bombings in Israel. I know it can be done, but you really have to search for sincerity.
ReplyDeleteWhat percentage of Muslims do you think are completely against suicide bombings of innocent Israelis?
ReplyDeleteI would like to think that the majority of anti-Islamics would prefer seeing the Muslim world change and openly show they are compatible with the West. Whether you think they Muslims are or not doesn't matter, perception is what it is all about, and going nuts over cartoons and not going nuts over terrorist acts is not good for Muslim PR.
ReplyDeleteYou don't get it. Perceived Muslim values is that they want to make the world Muslim.
ReplyDeleteEither they should change this perception, or they should stay in Muslim countries. Real simple.
Leo, if I still lived in Toronto I would still be taking the subway too.
ReplyDeleteBut don't think the RCMP is going to be able to prevent a terrorist attack. Although I respect them, that is asking a lot.