Difference Between Joanna Francis and a Bucket of Feces: The Bucket

A friend of Assmonkey Supreme, Mark Glenn, Joanna Francis is feces personified. Bear with me, let me explain.
Yesterday I got a hit on my blog from an old post made about me by a raving Jew hater. The Ugly Truth article was just a bunch of my replies to a retard (he didn't bother posting his ignorant crap), but one of the two comments caught my eye yesterday:

joannafrancis on November 10th, 2006

“You have kids. Hopefully they didn’t inherit your self loathing and inferiority and low IQ. If they did they did and think like you, they should have been aborted.”

Definitely a Jew. Only a Jew would write something like that. They love abortion. For us, that is. And they wonder why people don’t like them?


I decided to further investigate this Joanna Francis. Such a lovely non assuming name and all. Well, it linked to a Jooooo paranoid hate site, No Peace Without Justice.

Check out her site. 80%+ of her posts blame Jews for everything from Anna Nicoles burial place to abortion being a Jewish conspiracy to murder Christian babies worldwide. HAHAHAHAHA

Classic: Jews Murder Christian Babies At Sea

"Jews have been the driving force behind legalizing abortion in (formerly) Christian countries, such as the United States, France, England, Canada, et al. But in some Western nations, the people still have a modicum of common sense, and refuse to allow Jews to get rich performing their favorite pastime: Jewish ritual killing of Christian babies.

The Jews were obviously frustrated by their inability to practice infanticide in every country of the West. However, the people who invented the word chutzpah were not going to let quaint things like laws, morals, or respect for life get in the way of their fun. As expected, they came up with the perfect solution to satisfy their infanticidal needs: abortion ships that dock in countries where abortion is illegal. Kind of like riverboat casinos anchored permanently on the Mississippi, circumventing anti-gambling laws in the surrounding states."

And of course, this has to be pinned on the Jews because Rebecca Gomperts, the founder of Women on Waves, has a Jewish sounding name. Her proof she is a Jew is this link. Yes, there have been many Jews with the last name Gomperz (who cares about the spelling, close enough).
Such horrible Jews too:
Benjamin Gompertz the mathematician; Lewis Gompertz, founder of the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to animals; Samuel Gompers founder and president of the American Federation of Labor and the statue in Washington commemorating his life unveiled by President Roosevelt; and many gravestones and their inscriptions from the cemetery at Emmerich.

She apparently researched this article, Killing Us Left and Right, for 3 years.

There is speculation that Joanna Francis had an abortion early in life, and now she blames the Joooooos for making abortions so readily available to her. She now is overwhelmed with guilt that she had that abortion, as she can't conceive now, and now is childless, well past menopause. Instead of blaming herself, she found a scapegoat, as many self-loathers do.

I wonder how much research she put into Benedict XVI: Zionist Double Agent: "The Christian people in the United States are just as much enslaved to the Zionists as the Palestinians are. The only difference is that the Americans are mental slaves, i.e., brainwashed by the Jewish-owned media."

And this was well researched too, I'm sure: Israeli Snipers Killing US Troops In Iraq? At least she put a question mark in there. Rense didn't care about the question mark, they used her piece anyway.

NOW FOR THE GOOD STUFF

I'm sure Catholic Friends of Israel won't mind me copying this blog post:

PRIEST GIVES ANTI-SEMITES THE BOOT


Priest Ejects Group with Anti-Jewish Links, by Alex Easton. NorthernStar.com Nov. 25, 2006:

'A LISMORE priest has distanced his parish from a local extremist group of Catholics who back claims of a Jewish conspiracy of genocide against Christians.

St Carthage’s Cathedral rector Father Dennis Carroll this week took the unusual step of censuring the anti-abortion group Apostles for Life in his parish bulletin.

Fr Carroll told parishioners the group had lost his support and had been discontinued as a parish group. He warned parishioners ‘to be wary of the anti-Jewish views expressed’ on the group’s website.

Those views included an article by anti-Semitic writer Joanna Francis, which says abortion-on-demand ‘for American Jews signified the beginning of their Messianic age, wherein they could now freely practice genocide against their ancient enemies, the Christians, with impunity’.

In other articles, Ms Francis has also claimed Pope Benedict XVI was a Zionist double agent and that Israeli snipers were killing US soldiers in Iraq.

When contacted by The Northern Star, Fr Carroll said he stripped Apostles for Life of its status as a Parish group early this year ‘because they have spun off into the crazy right wing of Catholicism’.


The group's homepage proclaims that its members gather "to promote the truth and beauty of Church teaching, especially the Gospel of Life, and the sanctity of all human life." But I would think any organization whose website promotes articles asserting:

. . . What remains unspoken by these groups, however, is that abortion was always intended to be practiced on us goyim (cattle), as a means to reduce the numbers of their enemies. What better way to cull the herd than by preventing our births altogether? (Jews quietly lament the fact that some Jewish babies have fallen into the trap set for us goyim.). . . ("Killing Us Left and Right", by Joanna Francis 4/2/2006)

without thinking twice has fallen far afield of its original purpose, losing its moorings in the truth of the Catholic faith.'

Joanna Francis isn't even an accepted Catholic anymore it seems.

More Proof That The Internet Will Kill The YEC Movement

Youtube's popularity is growing exponentially. A great place to give your personal viewpoint too, well, as long as you aren't telling the truth about Islam that is.

One thing Youtube won't ban, for lies or distortions, are the wild claims made by Young Earth Creationists (YECs). But the thing these YECs don't get, is that if you start putting your nutjob ideas and beliefs out there like this, they are going to get destroyed.

There are two nutjobs that have a series of idiotic videos on Youtube: Truthmakesfree, who could be John Pendleton, has a series of Pendleton videos. A chemist nutjob who has zero understanding of earth sciences it seems. The other guy is a young Fundy who uses the ID VenomFangX. The guy reminds me of Eric Foreman on the 70's show. The Foreman lookalike actually emailed me a few days ago and asked me to check out his garbage. I did reply, but it looks like someone else decided to destroy him and Pendleton on Youtube. Check out the new Actual series posted by akg41470:




And finally this one humiliates Pendleton:


Here is my Youtube email exchange I had with VenomFangX:

Hey there. It's nice to see a fellow youtuber posting video blogs about who they are and what they believe. I myself am doing the same thing, and want you to come check out my vids and tell me what you think.

http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=VenomFangX


What I thought:
Dude, I checked your video on the age of the earth and left a comment. If the age of the earth was only 6000 years old, science would be able to prove it using science. Especially a Christian scientist would become very famous if he could use scientific method to prove a young earth. The fact is that if the earth was young, there would be loads of evidence to support it. There is none. All you did was present faulty assumptions, that have been debunked. Quit denying reality. Science is not a conspiracy theory. Read this:
http://home.entouch.net/dmd/gstory.htm

I'm sorry, I can't watch any more of your videos. You are obviously brainwashed and hopefully one day you will wake up.

His response:
Scientists can and have proven the age of the Earth to be 6000 years old, just like scientists have proven that evolution is a hoax. However, The Bible says satan is the ruler of this world, and satan doesn't want that info getting out. More over, people don't want to acknowledge The Bible is correct, because that means God is real and judges all unrepentant sinners, who do not receive the gift of salvation through Jesus Christ.
If you want to see a real scientist proving the age of the Earth, check this out.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=l1msS71xL00

Me again:
Actually, just point me to actual scientific research that has been published by scientific journals confirming your lies that evolution has been proven to be a hoax and the age of the earth is 6000 years old.

You are in deep denial. It is very sad.

Fundy replies once more:
You don't get it. Evolutionist journals will plug evolution. Creationist journals will plug creation. One shows why the other is a lie, and the battle is waging even to this day. You just need to use common sense.
Every 'claim' an evolutionist has ever made has been based on leaps of logic so huge they would make superman's leaps and bounds look like a drop in the bucket.
Radio-carbon dating doesn't work. If all of creation came into existence at the same point in time, which the big bang theory speculates, then all matter should date to the same exact same age. The fact that evolutionists claim they can tell how old something is by radioactive decay is a complete contradiction to the fact that all things in the universe are exactly the same age. The matter in your body was created at the beginning of creation, along with everything else. One can not date the age of something by radioactive decay, because in order to do that, you must make the leap of logic in assuming that the radioactive decay has been consistant, and that all things obsorb and have been exposed to the same levels of radiation, which is impossible.
Scientists who believe in evolution carbon dated living snails and found them to be thousands of years old. Impossible, don't you think?
Moving right along. Scientists look at all the buried animals who has fossilized and believe that over millions or billions of years, mud and earth covered these dead animals/plant and they fossilized. I want you to do an experiment. Order a BBQ chicken from swiss chalet or something, and place it in your backyard, tied down firmly to the ground with an unbreakable metal chain, begged 5 feet into the earth. So, if an animal comes along to steal the deal chicken, they won't be able to. As the months go by, that chicken is going to decompose, and animals will come and pick at it's bones. Rain, snow, and wind will eventually cause the bones to dislocate and be sent far away from the corpse. Eventually, in only a matter of weeks, there will be nothing but your metal chain and giant steak into the ground. The chicken will be gone.
Indeed, the only way for something to fossilize with it's entire skeleton structure intact is to be buried instantly. The reason we are finding creatures all over the world fossilized indicates that something on a world wide level buried these creatures. That is where the historical story of Noah's Ark and the flood come in, which happened about 4400 years ago, to which this is plenty of proof. I have made a video about the Ark, which they found exactly where The Bible said it would be, matching the exact size and scale of the historical Ark.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YwMfqP-nrUU


My turn:
No, you are in denial. I asked you to show a scientific study that proves the earth is young, or a scientific study that debunks, refutes, or even runs contrary to evolution.
You obviously do not understand science at all, nor do you want to. You are quite the delusional speciman.
You are right now what I call wilfully ignorant, looking for excuses to make your book written by man for man, somehow literal, which it isn't.
You won't even come close to change my mind without scientific studies...real ones. In the meantime, I know where there is a lot of non believers you can try to convert. I started a thread for you:

http://ravingatheists.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=7010

Good luck. And Happy Converting.

He wasn't through yet:
All I have to say to you is this:
http://www.evolutionisimpossible.com/

Moi once more:
Dude, you are in denial. Again, you have nothing. Not one scientific study. Wake up and smell the roses, you are missing out on all of natures wonders. Don't bother replying to this, right now you are wilfully ignorant until you really start to think for yourself. You've been brainwashed, and you don't know it.

And his last desperate response:
I used to believe in evolution, I really did. Now I feel sorry for everyone who does.

Of course, I had to have the last word before I blocked him from wasting anymore of my time:
I used to believe in God, but then I started asking questions and the answers made me realize that God was man made, but even when I believed in God, I never put my head in the sand and denied science. You might as well be a heroin addict, because you are completely denying reality. Notice how you can't find one scientific study that I asked for. Science is not a conspiracy theory out to prove your bible wrong by the way. That is just a cop out. The internet will destroy you YECs, you should stay within your flock, because you dudes get destroyed when you try to compete with people who have at least half a brain.
*****************************************

Was I too hard on the dude, or was I too lenient?

How To Deal With Iran, Iraq, The Palestinians, and Islam In General

This may sound insensitive, cold, and heartless, but why sugarcoat reality? Islam is the biggest threat to humanity facing our planet today. The only hope mankind has is time for Islamic reform, but time is a double edged sword because of Muslim breeding habits.

Islam today is collectively run by blood thirsty, intolerant, Western hating Muslim leaders. The so-called moderate Muslims may be the silent majority, but their silence is deafening. Whatever it is that holds the moderates back from taking over leadership of Islam worldwide, whether it is fear of the radicals, or complacency, or not committing "the sin" of dissing a fellow Muslim, isn't important right now. The moderate Muslims aren't even close to being in control, to the point that they are perceived as a tiny minority by many.

America gave Islam too much credit when it came to the Iraq war. They thought like far Left Liberals; that if you rid a country of a tyrant's regime, the country will appreciate it and start to build and grow. The common perception that everyone wants to be part of a Western culture with Western goals gets thrown out the door when you are dealing with Muslim countries.

The collective Muslim leadership today wants an ignorant world where there are only three groups: Muslims, Dhimmis, and the dead.

Islamic countries are a crematorium for common sense, intelligence, and free thinking. "...the Islamic countries are considered the greatest crematorium for books and the greatest slaughterhouse for freethinkers in history, and we see that the majority of freethinkers in Arab and Islamic countries are either expatriates or have chosen to keep silent in order to remain safe."

Islamic countries are breeding intelligence out of their gene pools, and perhaps they been doing this for 14 hundred years.

I noticed a phenomenon when Muslims were interviewed regularly during the Lebanon war: Muslim leaders don't answer simple yes/no questions, where they know the simple answer exposes them and their ideologies. This recent interview illustrates my observations well:

OK, so what does all this have to do with dealing with Iran, Iraq, The Palestinians, and Islam in general?

Well, I've taken all the above into consideration, and I've concluded that the only way to deal with Islam it to use evolution to our advantage. This means wiping out the radical elements whenever we can, and periodically bombing Islam into the 21st Century.

Iraq: I support Western troops whole heartedly, but the reality of the situation is that it is a lost cause to put anymore Western lives at danger. The Muslims have proved that they will keep attacking and attacking. The best way to deal with this problem, is to leave, let the Iraqis deal with things by themselves. If a group emerges that poses a threat to the future of our homo sapien species, then tactical bombs should be launched. If it pisses off the Muslims...........too bad. If it isn't tactical bombs that pisses them off, it is cartoons.
Also, I want to make it clear that the soldiers who have died in Iraq have not died for no reason. Their deaths have paved the way to give humanity a chance to keep going. Fighting this war against Islam, trial and error had to be employed. The Muslims have proved they are not ready to enter the 21st Century yet. America tried the quick route, it has all but failed, but now they know what needs to be done.

Iran: Tactical bombs. Negotiations. More tactical bombs. Repeat until they wave a white flag. Forget about Israel for a minute, even Saudi Arabia doesn't want this mental case regime to have nukes. The Islam mentality isn't the Communist Cold War mentality. Islamists don't mind dying for Allah. They can't have nukes, no way, no how.

Palestinians: I'll repeat this; If the Arabs dropped their arms, there would be peace. Israel needs to define continuous final borders that surround most of their existing settlements in the West Bank.
The Arabs are gonna whine and attack regardless of where they are. The "Green-Line" was a non issue to them, and they voted in a leadership that isn't after a state that lies next to a Jewish state, but one that has a goal of eliminating the Jewish state.
Draw the final borders, build a giant wall. The attacks won't stop, but Israel will have carte blanche to use tactical bombs until whenever the bombing stop. The Palestinians can call the land on their side of the wall whatever the hell they want to call it, but they will be responsible for whatever bombs are launched from their side of the fence too.

Islam in general: The average non Muslim couple in Europe now have less than 2 children each. Muslims have over 4 or 5 kids per couple. Over population is a concern for our species as is. I see nothing wrong with putting a heavy tax on anyone who has more than two children in the West.
Also, I am all for racial profiling. My rights mean squat when we are dead.
Muslims are exactly why the West must maintain a huge separation of church and state. No praying in school gyms for example, and quit fighting reality when it comes to evolution in the classroom. Muslims don't believe in evolution for the most part. Teach them evolution and make every child take science classes(facts need to be taught, this is not an ideological issue), and then Muslims will see their bible is not to be taken literally. Believers who don't take their bible literally have a far greater chance to become tolerant of mankind as a whole.

I'm tolerant of those who don't want to force their ideology on me and/or want to change my way of life. I'm not tolerant today of what Islam is all about today.

My Response To CNN's Segments On Atheism

This winging it is tough. I missed making some good points. Oh what the heck. I'll get better at this. I wanted to touch on the fact that Atheists are grossly under represented in jails and that contrary to what Dawkins says, not all Atheists are peaceful and gentle. I think he forgets that we come in all shapes and sizes and we all have different political ideologies.
I wanted to talk about the so called Godless Lifestyle that Preacher Man was talkin bout. An Atheists lifestyle is the same as a Fundies except we don't waste our time praying to an invisible sky fairy, or wasting our Saturdays and Sundays worshipping an invisible man made myth.
And another obvious point about morality is that if a Christian didn't have God or the bible to guide him, would he run around raping, stealing and murdering everyone around him? Are Christians insane without their bibles and God? I don't think so, many Atheists are ex-Christians, and they don't rape, steal, and murder very much.

Here is the CNN segment from last night that I was pretty much responding to:


VALENTINES DAY UPDATE:

Since it is Valentines Day, I took it upon myself to shovel the driveway. The snow was deep, and it took me quite a while to finish. I think I went temporarily insane, because the next thing I knew, I carved out a giant heart in the snow facing my front window:


I know it isn't a perfect heart, but there is no such thing as a perfect marriage either.

I showed it to my wife, and she got a sappy grin on her face. Somebody is gonna get his rocks off tonight:)

Happy Darwin Day: Human Evolution Quiz

I found this while doing a search to help me bitch slap the Fundidiots I have been attracting lately. Get a pen and paper. Take a shot. Note: Answers not provided.


______1. The position of mammals in evolution is best described as
a) they dominated life in the sea
b) they were among the first animals to live on land and their variety outstrips all living things
c) they arose from mammal like reptiles in the Triassic but remained small and insignificant while dinosaurs dominated the land
d) mammal gave rise to birds
e) All of the above are correct.

______2. All of the following are characteristics of primates Except the
a) five long dexterous digits on hands and feet
b) three dimensional binocular vision
c) well developed brain
d) opposable thumb
e) rapid postnatal maturation

______3. Which reflect(s) general trends in primate evolution
a) selection for greater ability to detect odors
b) rotation of eyes sideways to cover a wider field of view
c) shortening of gestation time to produce mature young sooner
d) increase in forebrain development, and large proportions for vision, hearing and touch
e) All of the above are correct.

______4. Anthropoids include all Except
a) apes b) humans c) lemurs d) monkeys

______5. The group thought to be ancestral to both apes and humans is
a) Australopithecus afarensis b) Australopithecus afaricanus c) Proconsul d) Homo habilis e) Homo erectus

______6. Sometimes biologists are alleged to have said that "man comes from monkeys or apes." The correct
way for a modern biologists to explain the apparent sequence of human evolution is
a) monkeys have evolved less than humans
b) humans and monkeys share a common ancestor
c) humans and monkeys are biologically identical
d) evolution leads toward more perfect forms and humans therefore came after modern monkeys

______7. Frequently used in psychological experiments, the most humanlike of the apes is the
a) gibbon b) gorilla c) baboon d) chimpanzee e) orangutan

______8. The fossil called Lucy is a member of the species _____, which lived about 3.18 million years ago.
a) Australopithecus afarensis b) Australopithecus afaricanus c) Proconsul d) Homo habilis e) Homo erectus

______9. When different body parts evolve at different rates, the process is called
a) stasis b) catastrophism c) gradualism d) mosaic evolution e) punctuated equilibrium

______10. From the following group, the most recent ancestor of modern humans is thought to be
a) Australopithecus afarensis b) Australopithecus afaricanus c) Proconsul d) Homo habilis e) Homo erectus

______11. The main features that place Homo habilis in the genus Homo rather than Australopithecus are
a) human facial appearance and lack of hair
b) advanced use of language and total carnivorous diet
c) brain size, posture and dentition
d) care of young and altruistic behavior
e) hand grip, extensive use of tools, and house building

______12. The first archaic humans absolutely known to have produce stone tools are
a) Australopithecus afarensis b) Australopithecus afaricanus c) Proconsul d) Homo habilis e) Homo erectus

______13. The study of the extent to which humans have similar DNA in their mitochondria is a study
a) of "mitochondrial Eve," and suggests a common ancestry in Africa or the out of Africa hypothesis.
b) by DNA probe, and apes and humans are so different they had to have split over 33 million years ago.
c) by DNA hybridization, and apes and humans are similar enough to have split only six million years ago.
d) by DNA hybridization, and chimpanzees and humans are essentially identical and probably split only one million years ago.
e) by DNA hybridization, and African apes and humans are similar enough to have split only six million years ago.

______14. The stone tools and the dentition of Homo habilis indicate that early humans were
a) strictly herbivores c) strictly carnivores
b) strictly scavengers d) omnivores that could either scavenge or hunt for meat

______15. Which of these is Not considered and archaic human?
a) Homo habilis b) Neanderthal man c) Homo erectus d) Cro-Magnon man

______16. All of these humans are believed to have evolved in Africa Except
a) Homo erectus b) Homo habilis c) Cro-Magnon man d) Neanderthal man

______17. Previously the many fossils of Homo erectus found between 1.9 and 0.3 MYA were all considered
Homo erectus. Now they are divided into
a) Homo erectus and Homo habilis
b) Homo erectus and Homo ergaster
c) Homo erectus and Homo sapiens
d) Homo erectus and Homo neanderthalensis
e) Homo neanderthalensis and Homo sapiens

______18. In contrast to the out of Africa hypothesis, the multiregional continuity hypothesis contends that
Homo erectus migrated to many continents as many as one million years ago, and all populations evolved into modern humans because
a) no further evolutionary changes occurred.
b) there was sufficient gene flow between populations to maintain one species.
c) constant warfare allowed one or another lineage to dominate.
d) hybrids between different lineages were superior and replaced their ancestors.
e) all lineages changed but in response to the same evolutionary pressures so they changed independently in the same way.

______19. Meaningful speech is thought to have perhaps develop in
a) Homo erectus b) Homo habilis c) Cro-Magnon man d) Neanderthal man

______20. Lucy's skeleton revealed that she was bipedal. This means that she
a) walked using all four limbs c) lived in trees
b) walked on two legs d) crawled along the jungle floor

______21. The first primates to appear were
a) australopithecines b) prosimians c) gorillas d) bonobos

______22. Two distinct features of all primates are
a) binocular vision and grasping hands c) grasping hands and feet
b) binocular vision and a large skull d) large eye sockets and binocular vision

______23. Since DNA sequence in humans and chimpanzees are very similar,
a) humans must have evolved from chimpanzees
b) chimpanzees must have a single stranded DNA
c) humans and chimpanzees must have a common ancestor in recent geologic history
d) humans and chimpanzees are the same species

______24. Most early hominid fossils have been found in
a) South America b) Africa c) North America d) Australia e) Asia

______25. Most scientists agree that the oldest known hominid was
a) Homo habilis b) Australopithecus afarensis c) Australopithecus boisei d) Home erectus

______26. Homo habilis
a) is known for its large brain c) used crude stone tools
b) lived in Africa d) All of the above.

______27. The first member of the genus Homo was
a) Homo sapiens b) Homo erectus c) Homo habilis d) Homo hominid

______28. Evidence of intelligence of Homo erectus includes
a) their large eye sockets they had c) the written messages they left on cave walls
b) tools found that they made d) the signs of primitive agriculture

______29. Homo erectus had a
a) pair of large eyes c) lighter skeleton than other hominids
b) written language d) brain almost as large as that of modern humans

______30. Homo erectus evolved into
a) Homo habilis b) Australopithecus c)Homo sapiens d) the genus Homo e) Lucy

______31. Prosimians were the first primates and were successful for two reasons. One reason was that they
possessed grasping fingers and toes. The other was
a) homeothermy
b) ability to walk on two legs
c) monogamous mating
d) binocular vision
e) omnivorous diet

More quizzes can be found here at the AP Biology Home page

Note: I can't find a link to the answers. Everyone is on their own. If someone has the answers or wants to take a shot, just leave it in the comment section.

I like tests like this, because I'll take a shot at the answers and then do internet searches to see if I'm right. I admit I'm not a biologist, but thank science, I'm not a creationist retard either. Lots of learning to be had.