If you want BS or Political Correctness you have come to the wrong place. FAQ How can you be an atheist Jew?
April 9, 2007
Thoughts on Passover and Easter
First off, I stayed clear of both celebrations this year. I didn't even accompany my wife to my neighbour's house for Easter turkey, or whatever it is people eat on Easter.
I admit, I watched a few National Geographic's and Discovery Civilization "documentaries" about Jesus and the Exodus. Now, you have to understand, it has only been three years since I made the discovery that a historical Jesus and a historical Exodus have zero contemporary evidence attached to either. I always assumed that lots of Jews left Egypt around 3200 years ago, and that Jesus was a Jewish rebel rabbi.
For me, it started innocently enough. I was just looking for descriptions of what Jesus looked like from historical sources, because at the time there was lots of news about Mel Gibson's The Passion, which was just announced as going into production.
I started doing internet searches, and wound up finding out that there is no historical evidence that Jesus even existed. In fact, there were lots of similar stories to what the Christ story evolved into over time. There is historical evidence that the similar stories were part of the cultural myths, and they were there way before Jesus supposedly lived.
The Exodus revelation happened for me in a similar way. Actually a Jew hater asked for evidence that Jews left Egypt around 3200 years ago. Again, I did my internet searches, and now I'm convinced that Judaism most likely combined the Zoroastrian beliefs and the monotheistic views of Akhenaten. There is very little out there to make me believe that Judaism even existed prior around 700 BC and perhaps, it is even younger than that, when Ezra wrote the myths down. That could have easily been the birth of Judaism. For sure, there is no evidence whatsoever that Jews were slaves in Egypt, and the numbers who supposedly left were improbable regardless of evidence (but so are the plagues).
Watching from the perspective of knowing that no evidence exists, when tons of evidence should exist (please apologists, just shut up on this one), I just shook my head a lot and watched theologians and pseudo historians explain what happened.
To me, when it comes to these dolts trying to figure out/make excuses as to whether Mary Magdalene and Jesus were married or had sex, for example, is like watching someone trying to figure out if The Cat In The Hat was gay or not.
If you take a step back, and listen to all the speculation and excuses, like why it took 40 years for Jews to cross the Sinai, when it takes 10 days to walk it going into a gale force wind, you just have to laugh...........if you are a rational human being, that is.
Both the Jesus story, and the Exodus story, sound like children's stories to me now. I just can't get over how easy it is for so many adults to fall for these obvious make believe tales.
I guess if the stories were based on real people and events, the stories would never have made past the 200's.
April 8, 2007
The Internet Atheist Movement
I made this video to make atheists aware of all the great resources and sites that are available on the internet. Atheists are becoming more fearless...OK, less intimidated, to speak up about ourselves and our non beliefs:
Live Science has a funny piece called The Coulter Hoax. Even Live Science is taking pot shots at the reality denying Fundies. I love it.
The internet will be the death of the Young Earth Creationist movement. It is just a matter of time.
Live Science has a funny piece called The Coulter Hoax. Even Live Science is taking pot shots at the reality denying Fundies. I love it.
The internet will be the death of the Young Earth Creationist movement. It is just a matter of time.
April 6, 2007
The Thinking Blogger Award
Beep! Beep! It's Me has tagged me. Here are the original rules from The Thinking Blog:
1. If, and only if, you get tagged, write a post with links to 5 blogs that make you think,
2. Link to this post so that people can easily find the exact origin of the meme,
3. Optional: Proudly display the 'Thinking Blogger Award' with a link to the post that you wrote
4. Only choose blogs that haven't been picked before (this one wasn't one of the original rules)
OK, this is a tough one. All of the blogs on my blogroll make me think. And even blogs by retards make me think. In fact, I'm thinking right now and I'm not even reading a blog. I really don't like this tagging stuff. I apologize in advance for those who I am tagging, especially if they feel compelled like I did, to continue with this insanity:
1. Everything Is Pointless: I sometimes hesitate going to his blog because I know it will force me to think more than I want to.
2. Babble, Bullshit, Blasphemy, & Being (AKA Choose Doubt): The closest thing to a Vulcan Atheist in the blogosphere.
3. Scientia Natura: Evolution and Rationality: Really good spins on current stories from a science chick.
4. The Sudanese Thinker: He reminds me that there might be a light at the end of the tunnel for humanity, and that the third world has thinkers too.
5. Gripes Of Wrath: Must make me think, because I often comment on his blog. The thing is, he is like me, an Atheist who understands the threat of Islam.
April 4, 2007
More Fun Using Peanut Butter To Disprove Evolution
I decided to expand on the scientific "logic" used in the now famous creationist Peanut Butter video (I even go out of character for it):
Damn laryngitis is impeding on my full creative genius.
Here is the original version of Peanut Butter: The Atheist's Nightmare in case you are one of the very few who hasn't seen it:
Maybe a few of my readers can do a video or just a post disproving evolution too. It is kind of fun.
What else? Oh, I made a minor edit in the Atheism page of the Uncyclopedia.
I just made an edit to the Atheism entry:
==The Difference Between Atheists and Agnostics==
There is only one distinct difference between an atheist and an agnostic. An atheist will not turn down eating a fetus if it is offered to them, while an agnostic will always say no if offered.
A strong atheist is someone who goes out of his or her way to eat fetuses, while a weak atheist will not be the one to buy or cook a fetus. A weak atheist is sort of like the guy at the party who never buys pot, but will never turn down a toke when it is offered to him.
***********************************
Note: This is the second time within a week I placed the above on the Atheism page. Someone trashed it the first time. I don't get it. I think it is pretty funny.
Damn laryngitis is impeding on my full creative genius.
Here is the original version of Peanut Butter: The Atheist's Nightmare in case you are one of the very few who hasn't seen it:
Maybe a few of my readers can do a video or just a post disproving evolution too. It is kind of fun.
What else? Oh, I made a minor edit in the Atheism page of the Uncyclopedia.
I just made an edit to the Atheism entry:
==The Difference Between Atheists and Agnostics==
There is only one distinct difference between an atheist and an agnostic. An atheist will not turn down eating a fetus if it is offered to them, while an agnostic will always say no if offered.
A strong atheist is someone who goes out of his or her way to eat fetuses, while a weak atheist will not be the one to buy or cook a fetus. A weak atheist is sort of like the guy at the party who never buys pot, but will never turn down a toke when it is offered to him.
***********************************
Note: This is the second time within a week I placed the above on the Atheism page. Someone trashed it the first time. I don't get it. I think it is pretty funny.
April 3, 2007
Take This All You People Who Think I'm Stupid
Your Score Summary
Overall, you scored as follows:
97% scored higher (more stupid),
1% scored the same, and
2% scored lower (less stupid).
You are 2% stupid. This means...
You are our next Einstein. Wow! Keep up the great thinking.
H/T Hear, O Israel
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)